[Dr. Franklin]

When do the RINOs get out of the way, or get run over?

When does WI decertify the fraudulent 2020 election returns?

[Mr. K]

What a surprise

[pas]

“I’d say it’s somewhere between 100% and 100%,” The author sure cuts them short. I would bet many managed to vote 2 times or more.

[Pollard]

They went to computerized voter rolls and then to a different computerized voter rolls and on one change of systems, were unable to get the birth dates to carry over so people ended up with the default DOB. At least that’s the story I read somewhere months ago. Kinda makes sense. If someone’s going to insert half a million fake names, is it so hard to insert fake, random DOBs? Were all half million named John Doe? Do all half million have the same address?

See what I mean. If you’re going to the trouble of making up random names and addresses, why wouldn’t you go ahead and make up random DOBs?

It’s just a case of government incompetence in being unable to bring over the DOBs into the new system or buying a new system that was incapable of that. The right tech person probably could have figured out a way but not some gubmint lackey. People in gubmint give contracts to or hire their friends and relatives, regardless of competence.

[StACase]

Depending on your source for Wisconsin's population in 2016 and 2020, the population grew by 60,000 to 120,000. During the same period, the total vote for president grew from 2,787,820 in 2016 to 3,240,738 in 2020. That's an increase of over 450,000 or in other words, the number of total votes in Wisconsin increased faster than the population by a factor of 3.8 to 7.5 between 2016 and 2020.

By the way, This Page from the 2012 election is only retained by the WayBack Machine. Similar pages for the 2016 and 2020 elections are not available anywhere. The popular vote totals was available for the 2016 election and probably for the 2020 election, but all three including the page for the 2012 election have been removed at the archives.gov website. It would appear that someone doesn't want people looking at the popular vote numbers.

[JimRed]

Yeah, this’ll be all over the news this evening...NOT.

[SuperLuminal]

Hmmm...
These 115,252 voters REALLY take citizenship seriously...
Must be among the advantages of being a vampire...

Guess the Founding Fathers forgot to protect the rights of vampires...

[The Truth Will Make You Free]

This obviously needs to be checked out, but it could be a legitimate computer glitch. Maybe a Y2K bug changed birthdays. Maybe batteries went out somewhere. This has the feel of Floyd’s death — there’s more to than what is first told.

If it is fraud, heads need to roll.

[Chewbarkah]

What is reported certainly justifies further analysis. From the entire article, and a video with the expert talking, at TGP, I’m trying to square away what is being claimed:

569,277 of Registered Voters have registration dates of 1-1-1918. (As others have said, that could be a default setting in the system. Remains to be seen how that plays into the fraud).

119,283 of the 569,277 are listed as “Active” voters.

449,994 of the 569,277 are listed as Inactive, but haven’t been deleted as Registered. Begs the questions of whether “Inactive” registrants can legally cast votes if “they” show up (or submit Mail-In/Absentee ballots), or if any Inactive registrants did cast votes in Nov 2020.

115,252 presumably of the 119,282 Active registrants voted in Nov 2020. Pretty high turnout for 100+ year-olds. Would be interesting to analyze out date/time/method of those votes.

All 569,277 need to be examined on an individual basis by human beings, with priority on the ones shown to have voted, then the 4,030 still listed as “active” who didn’t vote. I wonder if this 1-1-1918 phenomenon is more prevalent in some election districts than others...

[Pearfect]

The 2020 election was riddled with FRAUD.

FRAUD !!!!

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]