Is insufficient testing of products with lengthy, documented histories of failure the new norm?
Two whole months of testing - what did that show about PFizer and Moderna? That they were more effective than they actually are? That they are far more harmful than the companies will admit, and said companies are fighting the release of their raw data...for 75 years?
Have we learned anything yet? The whole approach is toxic. These are gene thereapy agents, wherein you'd expect all the tissues throughout your body to experience the gene 'correction' for something like PKU or other congenital genetic problem. Mind you, these medical agencies are less conscientious than the doctor who created Frankenstein, but in theory, and according to FEC and FDA documents, these are gene therapy agents designed to move throughout the body and supposedly make 'corrections'.
This 'theory' doesn't work for 'vaccines'. You don't want spike proteins attaching to your vital organs and being targeted by your own immune system. That's what's going on now - ADE or autoimmune issues.
Novavax has the same problem as Pfizer and Moderna and J&J - autoimmune problems. Novavax is an injection of pure spike proteins that attach to vital organs and are targeted by your immune system.
Just say 'No' to the latest entry into biowarfare agents. Isn't it obvious by now we don't need, and never needed, a vax?
“”At 70 days out from receipt of the second dose, 0.8% of participants in the placebo group had developed covid-19, compared with only 0.1% in the vaccine group.””
that would be a .7% absolute reduction in infection ... so, vaxxing 1,000 people reduces the number of infections by 7 ...
Notable is how often the word “testing” is used. So clearly they’re using the public still as test patients who get any of these shots.
Not long enough period to determine a favorable outcome as I see it.