Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: flamberge

But the shot was a voluntary choice.
For a large number of people, it was not.

Show me one gun to a persons head. Take a jab or your fired, isn’t a force, its a choice ultimatum. Some people took the old Johnny Paycheck stance and told them to shove the job. Others cowardly out of financial fear, traded their health for job security in a job they probably hate.

What a person believes an insurance company will cover is usually revealed after they get hit by a flood, and thats not covered. Life insurances don’t cover suicide or murder, so I fail to see how or why they would cover a voluntary experimental jab.

Time will tell. Just saying that if it was the MAGA Deplorian Insurance Company, I would tell them go ahead and sue! You weren’t forced and it was experimental.


87 posted on 01/19/2022 8:29:44 PM PST by The MAGA-Deplorian ( 2022 - VOTE THE BUMS OUT —— ALL OF THEM! RE-ELECT NO ONE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: The MAGA-Deplorian
Life insurances don’t cover suicide or murder

Many of them do cover suicide, though there is often a five-year exclusion period for such coverage - and substantial premiums added. Being murdered is hardly grounds for a payout denial in any policy of which I have ever heard. Check out the "Dead Peasant" insurance policies that convenience store companies routinely take out on the lives of their store managers.

It is not about what may not be covered. An upfront condition that is clearly identified as an exclusion is perfectly legitimate.

If the MAGA Deplorian Insurance Company writes a life insurance policy that plainly excludes death attributed to the mRNA treatment from coverage, there is nothing wrong with that.

Other than the Government will take offense to that contradiction of their "safe and effective" narrative. And they will find 17 ways to destroy the company through regulatory audits and violation findings.

Maybe that is why the big insurance companies are mostly staying quiet about this. But they are about to lose a very large amount of money if they don't do something. Their actuaries can tell them how much they are going to lose - to four decimal places. They have enough data right now.

Take a jab or your fired, isn’t a force, it's a choice ultimatum.

I see that as a coercive measure just barely short of a gun to the head. And in any case, it is a completely illegitimate demand from an employer or a government. Walking away from such organizations is the right and best thing to do.

Congratulations to you for having the financial resources, and the courage to face your employer and say Hell No! Even better that your employer backed away in the face of too many such refusals.

When the government is pressuring all employers to adopt the same illegitimate policy, there is no place to run. And the ultimate enforcement of harmful policy leads quite literally to a gun pointed at someone's head.

"Go ahead and sue! We got more lawyers than you!" is indeed the policy of most large organizations. It is not going to work this time.

Considering the magnitude of the potential early deaths and resulting losses from the "mandated" mRNA treatments, if these are realized, the legal arguments will become irrelevant.

The bets are mostly all in, and we all just waiting now for the big "reveal". As you say, "Time will tell". It is already whispering pretty loud.

88 posted on 01/19/2022 9:40:46 PM PST by flamberge (Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson