Major University Eyes Forcing Professors to Pledge to 'Diversity, Equity and Inclusion' or Have Their Tenures Denied

I chose a different letter order... DIE. That putrid garbage oozed into the "annual training" this year. Last year it was another exercise in fakery labeled "unconscious bias". The way to get the "right" answer was to select the most outrageously stupid possibility. It was designed to be irritating. The "DIE" garbage continues to push the outrageous and rub it in by saying we are "never finished". The employees are expected to become immersed in the neurotic issues of a variety of groups. There is no way I have time to indulge in this fringe exercise and still deliver a quality product to my customers.

My internal company website is now mentioning ESG scores and is littered with "employee resource groups" catering to all manner of minority interests. I miss the hardcore science/engineering company that was well run as an employee owned company. Taking it public invited in a broad range of populist corporate nonsense. I'm staying another year at this point. Hopefully the corporation doesn't crater under all of the SJW nonsense.

Yup. The left are engaged in a hostile takeover of our country. They are,controlling the narrative, (with the help of big businesses, universities, the msm, even courts and judges [who demanded that the political prisoners renounce Trump or,lose their chance at bail], and theynenforce their narrative changes with the help of violent domestic terrorist groups blm and antifa

The left have bastardized science, and have made a mockery of common sense. They know that junk that they say is totally ridiculous, butmthey do,it deliberately as a form of control to force people to accept,the most,idiotic stuff possible. They get their kicks,out-of forcing people to surrender their wills to their demands

Insane and Evil times indeed- what theynare forcing on the nation is marxism

In 1949, during the Cold War, the Board of Regents of the University of California imposed a requirement that all University employees sign an oath affirming not only loyalty to the state constitution, but a denial of membership or belief in organizations (including Communist organizations) advocating overthrow of the United States government. Many faculty, students, and employees resisted the oath for violating principles of shared governance, academic freedom, and tenure. In the summer of 1950, thirty-one "non-signer" professors--including internationally distinguished scholars, not one of whom had been charged of professional unfitness or personal disloyalty--and many other UC employees were dismissed. The controversy raised critical questions for American higher education.
[Read more here:]
The Loyalty Oath Controversy: University of California Berkeley

It's ironic that the UC–Berkeley would later become the nexus of the "Free Speech" movement in the mid-60s. Loyalty Oath controversies spread from coast to coast in many institutions in the '50s and even before.

So the absence of white people is “magical”, eh?

Wonder how “magical” it will when whitey’s money is absent as well?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.