Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle

As I understand it, if it was accepted that there were already workable therapeutics then the emergency use authorization for the vaccine could not be used. There’s your rub.


13 posted on 12/31/2021 5:01:50 PM PST by Shoefus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Shoefus
Yes, along with several others.
1) EUA requires full disclosure of what ppl are given and the risks as best they are known.
2) It's not informed consent if people are not given truthful and complete information.
3) It's not informed consent if people are coerced.
4 It's unlawful to force military to take experimental therapies.
5) Guidance requires a panel of neutral and fully qualified physicians to oversee recommendations and approval. Neither CDC nor FDA is complying with their own rules. 6) The jab is not a vaccine, but a relatively ineffective theraapy for which there are better alternatives. 7) EUA's are normally withdrawn after a certain number of adverse events. 8) Authorised for pregnant women in direct contradiction of studies showing extremely high rate of miscarriages. 9) Authorised for children despite very low risk of disease and high rate of adverse events.
17 posted on 12/31/2021 5:36:15 PM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson