Posted on 12/25/2021 7:17:49 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Population reduction is an important part of life. /s
It is absolutely horrible that our government has provided no guidance or steps to take when someone is initially diagnosed with Covid. It’s almost as if they want you to get very sick.
I believe this is INTENTIONAL. With all the lies they’ve told about COVID in the last two years, and the desperation of the elite to use COVID to bring about their tyrannical goals, I wouldn’t put it past them.
Did anyone actually read the article? It says nothing of the sort.
Unbelievable.
The conclusion was that vaccine effectiveness goes down -50% over a couple months in regards to Omicrom compared to previous variants.
This non peered reviewed study says nothing at all about vaccinated people having a higher rate of infection than non vaccinated.
This post does state higher probability than if unvaxed after 90 days. Is this article interpretation of the study wrong?
Similar thread:
Study Shows That After Three Months The Vaccine Effectiveness Of Pfizer & Moderna Against Omicron Is Actually Negative
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4024226/posts
Good. I was vaxxed in March and April, and now I can finally get the Omicron variant and get a real immunity. Hurray!
Excellent corrected analysis of the Danish data involving negative vaccine efficacy that is being so widely discussed.https://t.co/lA1b46C85U pic.twitter.com/9NwLiX6IjF— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) December 25, 2021
I did read it, and agree. You will see that fairly often here.
Studies interpreted by lay people just conveniently are antivax.
Our study contributes to emerging evidence that BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 primary vaccine protection against Omicron decreases quickly over time with booster vaccination offering a significant increase in protection. In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.
So..."The Jim Jones Jab does not prevent you from getting sick with COVID-1984 Omicron so you should take the Jim Jones Jab because of COVID-1984 Omicron."
Only a Branch Covidian would follow that thinking.
Yes, the interpretation of the actual article is completely incorrect and blatantly misleading.
As far as peer reviewed studies are concerned, most authors won’t submit anything that could interfere with their future grants. Funding comes from the government.
The bottom line is that we’re going to have to rely on all cause age adjusted mortality studies of vaccinated vs unvaccinated. This will take some time for definitive results. You can’t manipulate age, death or vaccination date (unless you’re making “vaccinated” to mean 2 weeks post injection) But even then, you can usually determine the date when a person actually received the injection. That would be the best way to assess risk v benefit.
As far as I can determine there MAY be a short term benefit of a few months from the vaccine for the elderly that’s it. That said, the longer term risks are unknown. In other groups I think it’s clear that the risks outweigh benefits.
The other thing we should be doing is looking closely at unvaccinated recovered vs unvaccinated never ill.
It’s also clear that early aggressive treatment has been actively discouraged by government agencies and the reasons are self evident- promotion of vaccine makers and justification for more government control.
"That the vaccines provide no protection against Omicron, and can even make it more likely for you to be infected with the virus. While boosters may reduce that threat, it would only be for 30 days before that boost faded and the probability of being infected would return to that of the unvaccinated, or higher."
idk-the footnotes they published said the negative numbers were inverted and meant to be positive??? I believe this is the abstract: either way-goofy those Danes
In this brief communication we are showing original research results with early estimates from Danish nationwide databases of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against the novel SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) up to five months after a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines.
Our study provides evidence of protection against infection with the Omicron variant after completion of a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines; in particular, we found a VE against the Omicron variant of 55.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.5 to 73.7%) and 36.7% (95% CI: 69.9 to 76.4%) for the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, respectively, in the first month after primary vaccination.
However, the VE is significantly lower than that against Delta infection and declines rapidly over just a few months. The VE is re-established upon revaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine (54.6%, 95% CI: 30.4 to 70.4%).
Good news for you then. You can now have an excuse to get vaxxed every 3 months
-PJ
While boosters may reduce that threat, it would only be for 30 days before that boost faded and the probability of being infected would return to that of the unvaccinated, or higher.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.