Skip to comments.
Absolute Risk Reduction for Available COVID “Vaccines” is not 95% – It’s Closer to 1%
The Blue State Conservative ^
| 12/09/2021
| Steve MacDonald
Posted on 12/09/2021 5:50:15 AM PST by TheManWhoWantedToBeLeftAlone
The COVID-Cult dogma is rich in exaggeration and weighted down by deception. Nothing they have claimed is clinically or statistically accurate, and COVID-Galielo’s are quickly put before the inquisition to be examined by its Holy Officers.
Galileo was found guilty of “vehement suspicion of heresy” and forced to repent his sins before God and the masters of his time by reading remarks prepared for him by The Church.
These days, the blasphemers are nurses, doctors, clinicians, oncologists, epidemiologists, numerous professionals in scientific disciplines, all of whom have found themselves put before the inquisition – much like the climate scientists who dare to question that political endeavor.
This Church preaches a globalist Public Health agenda. A COVID Dogma that continues to suffer the science of many whose interests are not politics or policy but actual science and public health.
These blasphemers continue to ignore the Cult’s Pharisees, releasing mountains of research and analysis that contradict the preferred “revealed truths.”
One of the most egregious of which is that the Cult’s mRNA cure is 95% effective.
This fraud references relative risk reduction instead of absolute risk reduction to confuse the debate. What’s the difference? It’s actually pretty rare (especially in my world of oncology) to see Absolute Risk Reduction reported in a study. You’ll find that you have to calculate it for yourself. But if it’s so important, why do you have to manually calculate it for most studies? Why isn’t it reported with the findings?
Absolute Risk is less sexy than Relative Risk. It doesn’t make for good press headlines. …
Simply put, Absolute Risk Reduction is the only way to identify the true context of something reported in a clinical trial. It’s usually a much smaller number than Relative Risk Reduction (RRR), but it helps you assess the real-world impact of a study finding. Even if we ignore the health risks from side effects, the mRNA injections cannot achieve the stated goal. Flatten the curve.
Instead of returning us to normal, they are the new normal. One that proliferates deceptions to protect the perception that public health is the driving interest. It is not, and the Absolute Risk Reduction, if widely known, would end the program and inspire more rebellion.
What is the actual number? Dr. Joseph Mercola’s analysis states: While the COVID injections have been characterized as being somewhere around 95% effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection, this claim is the product of statistical obfuscation.
In short, they’ve conflated relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction is actually right around 1% for all currently available COVID shots.1
In “Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials”2 Ron Brown, Ph.D. calculates the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections, based on their own clinical trial data, so that they can be compared to the relative risk reduction reported by these companies. Here’s a summary of his findings: Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2 — Relative risk reduction: 95.1%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.7% Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273 — Relative risk reduction: 94.1%. Absolute risk reduction 1.1%
Sure, some folks would still line up, and others would line up their children because the propaganda campaign has been fierce and relentless. But the Absolute risk reduction number explains things that the 95% lie cannot.
Global Warming continues to be low on most people’s priority lists because they can see it not happening as described or predicted. The same needs to hold for the COVID cult.
None of this is as they have claimed or predicted.
Galileo, by the way, continued his work under house arrest, and so should you, no matter what that looks like in the 21st century.
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: absolute; antivaxxcult; covid; fakenewssource; flunkedbiology101; ifitsontheinternet; itmustbetrue; risk; vaccine
To: TheManWhoWantedToBeLeftAlone
"If it does not work as well as you want,
we have a vaccine for that, too."
2
posted on
12/09/2021 5:51:26 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: TheManWhoWantedToBeLeftAlone
Yeah I think the 700k dead is a ridiculous number also.....I’m thinking it’s probly less than the flu has killed in the same time period
3
posted on
12/09/2021 5:56:21 AM PST
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: TheManWhoWantedToBeLeftAlone
Will you blog on the ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTION of wearing seat belts when driving/riding in a car?
And you should comment on your own blog entry threads occasionally also.
To: TheManWhoWantedToBeLeftAlone
People need to use some common sense. The Frankenshots ensure that you have a 99% chance of surviving the WuFlu. But if you don’t take them at all, you still have a 99% chance of surviving the WuFlu. It’s such a con and most people don’t want to admit they’ve been chumped.
5
posted on
12/09/2021 6:00:16 AM PST
by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
To: Diogenesis
If you have purchased your ticket to ride the Ronacoaster, Dr. Anthony Fauci now delivers the statement all ticket-holders were waiting for. Ronacoaster 2.0 is under construction. Notice how Fauci uses the word “we”, and even quantifies the term “we” by saying himself “and the pharmaceutical companies”, are prepared to start delivering variant specific vaccines as soon as the political scientists call for them.
This is the big tell, perhaps the biggest and most anticipated ‘tell’, that many were waiting to see.
This means each time some opaque entity within the system of world health identifies a “variant” of COVID-19, the business end of the process will trigger a vaccine response to keep the Ronacoaster wheels greased with taxpayer funds.
WATCH, and listen carefully to Fauci’s definition of who the decision-makers are. This is a remarkable amount of sunlight on the motive:
Keep asking:
…”WHO IS THIS ‘WE‘ YOU SPEAK OF?”
This directly ties to the recent statement of New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Arden, saying the Ronacoaster is a ride that will never end.
— New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern
6
posted on
12/09/2021 6:09:30 AM PST
by
Bratch
To: Sirius Lee
Probably even lower…
+80% are mostly asymptomatic
Of the remaining >20%, 98% survive
Now the are stacking the deck with kids who survive at least 99.997%, giving them the vaxx and making the results look better
And the count no deaths from the vaxx
It’s a scam.
7
posted on
12/09/2021 6:12:09 AM PST
by
aMorePerfectUnion
(Fraud vitiates everything ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘𐡏⁻ )
To: Sirius Lee
It’s absolute madness. If your starting point is 30% mortality, like Smallpox, then a vaccine that reduces this to practically zero is fantastic. If you starting point is that most people have a 99.9x% chance of surviving it with their God given immune system then a ‘vaccine’ that just pushes this to 99.999x% chance of surviving is a very small change.
I don’t believe the COVID death count either - the whole dying ‘with’ vs. ‘of’ COVID thing...especially ONLY COVID with no other factors.
Yet, for this, we strip Constitutional rights, empower politicians with authority they should not have, destroy small businesses, etc., etc., with the added atrocity that this is all going to be ‘the new normal’ and go on indefinitely. All due to a virus that was, in all likelihood, manmade.
So all fascists needed to do to impose fascism globally was to engineer a mild virus? That’s what we’re talking about - and it was always going to be an inevitable event once technology enabled the possibility.
8
posted on
12/09/2021 6:29:10 AM PST
by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
could you elaborate on the meanings of absolute risk reduction and relative risk reduction?
i want to understand that better
To: V_TWIN
"Yeah I think the 700k dead is a ridiculous number also.....I’m thinking it’s probly less than the flu has killed in the same time period"
I would bet everything I own that that is the case.
10
posted on
12/09/2021 6:49:11 AM PST
by
Sicon
("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
To: Sirius Lee
“It’s such a con and most people don’t want to admit they’ve been chumped.”
And the frauds in both medicine and politics, are so invested in and committed to the COVID lie, that they will NEVER let it go, and will never admit that they were either duped, or that they knowingly lied/misled everyone. They can’t, so they won’t. That’s as much a reason for why this farce continues, as is the sick, twisted, evil lust for power and control that most of them have.
11
posted on
12/09/2021 6:57:56 AM PST
by
Sicon
("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
To: V_TWIN
Yeah I think the 700k dead is a ridiculous number also.....I’m thinking it’s probly less than the flu has killed in the same time period>>> And the numbers include all of the old people murdered by cuomo, wolf, and murphy. that easily 100k.
To: kvanbrunt2
“And the numbers include all of the old people murdered by cuomo, wolf, and murphy”
Not to mention counting all the motorcycle accidents and heart attacks
13
posted on
12/09/2021 7:11:31 AM PST
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave)
To: ConservativeDude
You will have to search on line to define the terms...
I seem to remember that TheNNT.com has a definition.
In the meantime, here's a gift.
Keep in mind that any potential protection from the Dead Ferret Shot diminishes daily until somewhere between 3-6 months when you need continual boosters which may or may not work on new variants. It's a scam.
14
posted on
12/09/2021 7:35:04 AM PST
by
aMorePerfectUnion
(Fraud vitiates everything ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ࡚ࠢ࠘ ⸝່ࠡࠣ᠊߯᠆ࠣ࠘ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘𐡏⁻ )
To: Sicon
We are on the verge. When the army comes knocking on your door, syringe in hand, it’ll be too late for protests.
To: ConservativeDude
16
posted on
12/09/2021 8:15:27 AM PST
by
walkingdead
(We are sacrificing American youth's future on the altar of our own fear. And it is a travesty.)
To: Sirius Lee
"People need to use some common sense.
The Frankenshots ensure that you have a 99% chance of surviving the WuFlu. But if you don’t take them at all, you still have a 99% chance of surviving the WuFlu. It’s such a con and most people don’t want to admit they’ve been chumped."
All true. There IS risk in taking the shot though. According to Robert Kennedy Jr's book, a helluva lot more risk than we've been told. .
17
posted on
12/09/2021 8:29:45 AM PST
by
moehoward
(.)
To: walkingdead
Excellent video. Relative risk reduction is almost meaningless. 95% efficacy finally exposed.
To: V_TWIN
No just the old people murdered by cuomo, wolf and murphy. Wolf forced infected old folks back into nursing homes when the administrators told him they could not handle infectious diseases. He told them to take em back or we will close you down.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson