Did you ever hear the story of Tom Bauerle, the conservative radio host up in New York?
He came under the same surveillance thing as Patterson. It is not a mere FBI Mobile surveillance Teams. What he came under was based out of a research lab, and was using next generation tech, from a hologram machine that generated phantom people, to invisibility suits. He actually gathered enough evidence to get them to enter into a settlement with him, but from what I have gathered, they used the settlement to trick him into signing a non-disclosure, and now they are back screwing him over.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/vindicated-talk-show-radios-true-patriot-tom-bauerle
The invisible camouflage Bauerle described was also in another account of a guy who ended up gangstalked by this research/surveillance thing.
https://www.amazon.com/Chameleo-Invisible-Addiction-Homeland-Security-ebook/dp/B00ZDWEITO
People don’t grasp, technology is the biggest source of power, probably bigger than controlling our elections, and they have not been keeping us up to date on what the state of tech is. They have classified stuff which is far beyond what we think is possible right now.
Again, I am not vouching for this article. But I am saying people need to keep an open mind, because we have been getting lied to and deceived for a long time.
I haven’t heard the Tom Bauerle story, thanks for sharing it.
I’m actually familiar with the mentioned invisibility tech, though.
Hobby science nerd and former IBM Almaden Research Center alumni
myself… I’ve seen and also designed real science. I even got to play with
individual atoms. Dr. Don Eigler of Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscope Fame was a friend of mine.
I enabled remote control via OS/2 for that, for the 50th Anniversary of IBM Research celebration.
And your last statement:
“ Again, I am not vouching for this article. But I am saying people need to keep an open mind, because we have been getting lied to and deceived for a long time.”
I’m in complete agreement with that.
(But this article, and a great many that have appeared of late, following
the same formula? BS with an agenda to make thinking these Gene Therapy “Vaccines” are dangerous, seem silly...)
~Easy