But common sense needs to lead to hard evidence. And that’s what’s been lacking all along. Hard evidence. And to a degree common sense.
“But common sense needs to lead to hard evidence.”
You’re confusing hard evidence with something proven in a court of law. Hard evidence exists outside of the courtroom. The idea that evidence doesn’t exist unless a judge puts his stamp on it, is folly.
40% of murders in the United States go unsolved and never make it to court. Guess what? Those people were still murdered. Pretty strong evidence they were murdered by someone too, but has not been proven in court. The murderers are walking free, likely to kill again, but they are guilty nonetheless.
I am trying to make the point that hard evidence exists outside a court of law. There is tons of both statistical (yes can be used in court) and physical hard evidence that massive voter fraud exists.
The fact a political (both parties), justice, and a not-so-free press are determined to suppress the evidence doesn’t mean hard and statistical evidence isn’t there.
Your argument should be, “Yes, massive voter fraud happened, but the system will not allow it to come to light. So, stop worrying and complaining about it.”
Not shouting prove it! When the proof will not be allowed into the corrupt system.