Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pfizer modifies formulation of its COVID jab for 5 to 11-year old kids, adds ingredient used to stabilize heart attacks
NH365 ^ | 11/9/21 | Sara Middleton

Posted on 11/13/2021 6:07:58 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: gas_dr

Just another breathless and ignorant post where the author is this article clearly does not understand what she is talking about.

****************************************

I’m curious, do you have any intellectual curiosity at all?
Have you heard or read anything from Robert W Malone?
Did you hear or listen to any of the testimony on capital hill being led by Ron Johnson?

I really ask this in all seriousness, because it’s you that sounds really ignorant.

I have several doctors in my family, so I am used to people like you, we call them “intellectual drones.”

They are incapable of any individual thought. They can only spew talking points from things they learned in school, medical journals, CDC, or seminars ect.

The fact is, I don’t know anything about this drug, that was supposedly added into this vaccine.

However, my first thought is...

1. Is it true?
2. Why would they add it?
3. What will it do?

This is the normal reaction, and a lot of us will read up on it, so we can find out those answers.

Oh, but not you Dr. Drone, you will everyone ignorant, and wait for the medical talking points.


61 posted on 11/13/2021 12:18:54 PM PST by kara37 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kara37

Yes I have heard of Malone, I think he is a nut. Do I have any intellectual curiosity — four years to a doctorate level degree, 5 years postdoc training speaks for itself. Talking points we learned in school — that would be called science and scientific process — journals — you mean the things that advance the science — I have never quoted the CDC nor seminars — so your questions on its face demonstrate a bizarre belief that education and journals are talking points. Unlike, for example, the mind numbing talking points that are daily repeated by the antivaxxer conga line?

The fact is, I do know about this drug. It is not used to treat hear attacks, and the idiot who wrote the article has no basis in logic, reasoning, or any education — heart attack is not cardiac arrest is not myocarditis, and is certainly not treated prophylactically.

So you are actually guilty of projection — you have picked your savior Malone, you want to believe that you may have the foundation to understand what is being said when you cannot comprehend the question that has been raised.

The fact of the matter is I know how to ask scientific and probing questions — what is apparent is that you do not.


62 posted on 11/13/2021 8:02:38 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

My agenda is pure and simple, to correct that wide inaccuracies that prevail. I do not own Pharma stock, I simply have a working knowledge of medicine from a doctoral level. Your emotional language says it all.

As you will no doubt review and note, I do not think children require vaccination. I have never once advocated it nor suggested that it is proper. I actually can think independently and understand exactly what the actual nature of this disease is — unlike you and the conga line of people who cannot make an argument so you must resort to name calling.

I am sorry that a little knowledge makes me a jerk — but if so, guilty as charged. Anytime you want to step up and practice medicine instead of throwing daggers from the cheap seats, I will write you a good letter of recommendation so you can actually get educated.

I use to think you were an ignoramus. Now I know.


63 posted on 11/13/2021 8:08:19 PM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

The fact of the matter is I know how to ask scientific and probing questions
*******************************

No, you have no idea how to ask any questions. How could you? You already think you know everything.

The fact that you call Dr. Malone a nut says it all. He is a virologist and immunologist, inventor of mRNA Vaccines‬, DNA vaccines‬.

Sorry, your doctorate degree and 5 years training doesn’t hold a candle to his life’s work in vaccine research.

BTW, he is not my savior, God is.

Also, you seem silent about the investigation led by Ron Johnson. I’m sure all those people that have been hurt and killed by this vaccine just can’t comprehend how good the vaccine has been for them.

The truth is, you have already been proven to be a complete fool.

The vaccine doesn’t work. It can’t stop the spread, it can’t stop you from getting it, and it can’t even stop hospitalizations.
If it worked at all, why do you need a booster shot after 6 months?

This is obvious to anyone with half a brain, and no one needs a doctorate degree to understand it.

However, it seems you do need a doctorate degree to NOT understand it.


64 posted on 11/13/2021 9:55:05 PM PST by kara37 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: kara37

Well the fact is that your treat Malone as if he is the savior and gospel truth. And yet research demonstrates he is one of the dirty dozen spreading information that isn’t entirely accurate. My sense is that his statements are amped up by those who are cut and paste fans who have no foundational understanding of the nuance of his statements.

The problem that you are so beautifully crystallizing is the all or none response that is generally indicative of lack of understanding. No one scientist is ever entirely correct or incorrect. There is room for data interpretation. There is never a set of data points that fit the perfect regression line.

But you who think they grasp the scientific method and even logic on a larger stage are only capable of demonizing those who oppose a different view points. You are part of the problem of division and have no interest in searching for the truth. I have been more critical of Fauci than anyone else yet because I disagree with your sacred cows of the question i am besmirched are s shill for Fauci or big pharma or the deep state. That is the troika of boogie men for those who cannot argue the facts.

All available statements from FLCCC on down tend to help around the positions that I have taken on vaccination and therapeutics. But there is no room for you to take a reasoned and logical aporoach to the question. All you have is name calling and the opinions or others because you seem not to be able to figure out a data driven opinion on your own. Which is exactly why your side continue to support kooks, nuts, and the rabidly political.


65 posted on 11/14/2021 6:03:35 AM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

All you have is name calling and the opinions or others because you seem not to be able to figure out a data driven opinion on your own.

************************************

You get what you give Dr.
Every post I read of yours, you are calling someone names like ignorant and uneducated.

Like I said, I have plenty of doctors in my family, so I spend a significant part of my life around people like you. You are all basically clones of each other, and actually really boring to be around.

You can talk about data points that fit or don’t fit perfect regression lines. While most other people use basic common sense. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.

My mother and I always say that it takes years of education to become that dense.

I really believe that too. The most educated people seem to lose all common sense in the process. You are no exception.

The sad part, is that you probably do have a lot of knowledge to offer. However, you are so off putting that you alienate everyone, except the other doctors that act and think the same way.

It might have been helpful to know what you thought about the drug, and what’s it’s use. Instead, you go off on another rant calling people ignorant, and then quote your resume and education for the hundredth time.

My friend is battling a rare cancer. She knows everything about her cancer. I’m also sure she knows a lot more about it than you. That doesn’t make you an idiot, and it doesn’t mean that you couldn’t learn about it too.

Of course, your overall medical knowledge is vastly more extensive, but you aren’t a expert in every area, and I bet there are people that have read and studied more about this vaccine than you.

If you got control of your God complex, It’s possible that you might even learn something from someone that doesn’t a medical license.


66 posted on 11/14/2021 8:27:25 AM PST by kara37 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: kara37

So it’s a God complex to correct the record. When someone makes a complete uneducated statement such that the information makes zero sense on its face and uses terms as interchangeable that are as different as day and night I am supposed to not render a correction

The post is that this statement from this author is complete jibberish and nonsense. There is no foundation to even start to explain how anyone could state the things said with a straight face.

The scientific process sometimes up ends common sense. For example it was long thought the universe rotated around the earth. That was common sense. But it was false. Same thing here. Your appeal to common sense simply is an appeal to forgive lack of knowledge.

It appears to me that you fear knowledge. You want to claim expertise where you have none. But you want to be part of the conversation and relevant. Perhaps the reason you find experts boring is that you have no frame of reference for the conversation.

The sad thing is that if you don’t have some baseline knowledge or willingness to learn, you will fall for anything. Such as this bizarre and incorrect article.

Your lack of knowledge of not my lack of common sense. It is your lack of ability to discern between the two.


67 posted on 11/14/2021 8:47:34 AM PST by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

It appears to me that you fear knowledge.

*********************************

LOL, you have no idea my educational background, because I don’t have to post my resume to try to win an argument.

Although, it’s really none of your business, here is a little surprise you probably didn’t see coming.
I do have a college degree. Here is another little surprise. I was pre-med, and I was also accepted into medical school.
However, I changed my mind, and I decided to go a different direction.

I told you, we have a family full of doctors. That didn’t happen by chance, it was pushed in my family.

I’m done with you now. It’s boring conversation, when someone just talks in platitudes, and is incapable of independent thought.


68 posted on 11/14/2021 9:26:32 AM PST by kara37 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson