Posted on 11/09/2021 6:34:19 PM PST by TigerClaws
For the first time, the public can see the search warrant that was petitioned for and signed by former Judge Mary K. Wagner (D) for the contents of Gaige Grosskreutz’s cell phone. On September 23, 2020, less than one month after career criminal Gaige Grosskreutz seemingly attempted to shoot and kill 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse, Kenosha Police asked a judge for a search warrant. They wanted to seize and analyze the contents of Grosskreutz’s cell phone. Grosskreutz was the third man shot by Rittenhouse on August 25, 2020 and the only to survive. Grosskreutz is depicted on still photos and video pulling a gun on Rittenhouse after Kyle told him he was running towards police. Grosskreutz’s decision to pull a gun and seemingly attempt to kill the child, would prove unwise. He suffered a major injury to his bicep.
Police testified under oath in the affidavit that Grosskreutz’s cell phone “will contain evidence to include: images, videos, text, messages, phone calls, voicemails, social media messages, social media posts, other forms of electronic data, which things may constitute evidence of a crime….”
Former Kenosha Judge Mary K. Wagner, was oftentimes seen as the most liberal Judge to have been elected in Kenosha. She had extensive knowledge of Marsy’s Law and didn’t think it prohibited her from signing the warrant.
Detective Antaramian, the nephew of Kenosha’s Mayor, gave the Judge a ‘return on warrant’ five days later stating under oath, “The warrant was not served due to new information coming forward.”
That’s not what the other Detective said under oath. This is a big problem. One of the Detectives lied under oath.
Police knew at this time that Grosskreutz had an extensive criminal history of arrests and convictions including:
Domestic abuse against his grandmother Felony Burglary Criminal Damage to Property DUI Possession of Firearm by Felon Possession of Firearm While Intoxicated Prowling Loud Noise Obedience to Officers
DUI #2
Perhaps there was evidence that Grosskreutz went to Kenosha to wreak havoc? Perhaps he saw an opportunity to continue his life of crime and violence in a lawless environment? He put a gun in is waistband and headed to Kenosha nonetheless.
Detective Howard told the defense that he was told by the attorneys that he shouldn’t execute this warrant and upon being asked to name the attorney, he indicated it was T. Clair Binger (D).
Why would a prosecutor decide against obtaining more evidence of an incident of this importance? It is believed T. Clair Binger intentionally mis-interpreted Marsy’s Law in order to stop the defense from having access to Grosskreutz’s phone which would help illustrate his state of mind that night.
You can read the warrant in PDF form here or look below.
DA likely reloaded his “victim” was part of a conspiracy (RICO possibly) group there to riot. So he told the investigating officer not to execute the search warrant.
The contacts and recents alone should have been a treasure trove of information on domestic terrorism.
(Just my opinion)
Bkmk
Video: Detective Ataramian testifies prosecutors advised him to not search Gaige Grosskreutz’s phone
This guy is antifa. And the numbers of his fellow antifa people will be on that phone. Also, the fist guy shot came from the west coast. Everyone was antifa there. They streamed in from all over the country.
"The contacts and recents alone should have been a treasure trove of information on domestic terrorism."
I know that there are still active RR tracks going through Kenosha.
Now they seem to be both physical and virtual, going right through the courtroom.
I don’t know if Kenosha has a kangaroo display at the Zoo.
Heard that Defective Antaramian isn’t just related to the mayor but the prosecutor as well.
Don’t know if true, but would not surprise me at all.
If he knows of something that would make him not execute the warrant, isn’t it a Brady violation not to disclose it to tge defense?
Well, between the video I just saw of one witness testifying that the prosecutor wanted him to change amend his statement that he made to the police and now this.
It probably won’t happen, but I hope that the Defense team applies for Perjury warrants for both Detectives. Let see them go after each other and then the Prosecutor.
It’ll be fun to watch.
I haven’t been following this thing too closely but this prosecutor is starting to look more and more like Nifong and the Duke lacrosse case. It’d be wonderful to see him disbarred and prosecuted for whatever they can hang on him.
They referenced some law that protects crime victims. Likely originated in cases of rape. From exposing themselves broadly. But the detective said it’s the only time he’s not executed a search warrant.
Yes. After they had evidence in their possession they would have to share it with the defense. That’s why they purposefully dodged it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.