Posted on 11/06/2021 12:43:47 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Investigative reporter and attorney Techno Fog obtained CDC emails recently via a FOIA request that explain why they changed the definition of “vaccine” and “vaccination” on their government website.
The simple answer is because the experimental “vaccines” did not work and Americans were wising up to this fact. According to CDC emails this was “problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition”
So rather than reporting the truth to the American public — the CDC decided instead to change the meaning of the words “vaccination” and ‘vaccines.”
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1455610387135610880
Via TechnoFog substack.
CDC emails we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act reveal CDC worries with how the performance of the COVID-19 vaccines didn’t match the CDC’s own definition of “vaccine”/“vaccination”. The CDC’s Ministry of Truth went hard at work in the face of legitimate public questions on this issue.
In one August 2021 e-mail, a CDC employee cited to complaints that “Right-wing covid-19 deniers are using your ‘vaccine’ definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines…”
Getting no response, there was a follow-up e-mail a week later: “The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition.”
The change of the “vaccination” definition was eventually approved on August 31. The next day, on September 1, they approved the change to the “vaccine” definition from discussing immunity to protection…
Read the rest here.
At first glance, this looks like criminal activity. If a private company played word games like this with their product the government would have them shut down or fined. The CDC does this and nothing happens.
These people just got caught in another major lie. It’s about time they face justice.
So the CDC is like Wikipedia? Anyone can edit the articles?
Let me elaborate a moment. The litigation should now focus on what is a “preparation.” The point being that now (depending on what you feel a preparation is) previous exposure and survival (over 99% for younger healthy people) of Covid-19 will “...stimulate the body's immune response against disease....”
The various State, County, Local and federal vaccine mandates demand that the person be vaccinated. Now, according to the CDC, vaccination occurs when “the body's immune response against a disease” has been stimulated. Prior Covid survival has stimulated the body's response against the disease.
The whole point of the entire Covid response has been first to “flatten the curve” so hospitals will not be overwhelmed. Then it became “to get vaccinated so we can achieve herd immunity.” Now it has become, get vaccinated or loose your job, military service & benefits, and a host of other things.
This article and what it points out reminds me so much of Hillary Clinton's evolving views on such things as same sex marriage, Free Trade Agreements, what constitutes rape, etc. I guess Biden is evolving as he is corrupted by the power of WA DC.
I really like the Hoft’s and their good work for the conservative cause. However, I rarely go to Gateway Pundit for one reason: the site is so crowded with ads as to be nearly unusable. The front page constantly jumps around as ads load and reload, making it hard to read the stories. In the stories, the ad text is often hard to distinguish from the story text. I WANT to support them. I understand that advertising is what makes things go, but the site is SO disorganized because of the over-supply of ads that it makes it nearly impossible to view. I am sure that the site can be designed to be more organized and tone down the intrusive nature of the ads without losing any revenue. It needs to be done.
preparation
prĕp″ə-rā′shən
noun
The act or process of preparing. The state of having been made ready beforehand; readiness.An action done to prepare for something, especially for an event or undertaking.
product
prŏd′əkt
noun
Something produced by human or mechanical effort or by a natural process, as.An item that is made or refined and marketed.Such items considered as a group.
They didn’t change the definition because the jab didn’t work as advertised. They changed the defintion because anti-vaxxers were twisting the phrase “to produce immunity” to mean complete or perfect immunity.
No vaccine in our history has ever produced complete or perfect immunity.
The covid vaccine appears to produce complete immunity (they don’t get symptoms) in about 26% of vaccinated relative to the unvaccinated. And it appears to produce partial immunity (resistance to severe disese) in most of the vaccinated.
In that sense, the covid vaccines met the old definition.
The CDC should either not have changed the definition or added the words partial immunity.
I bet they change the definition again with in the year.
Please Support FR
Click The Pic To Donate.
One of N signs of a slime sucking liberal (where N is a very large number) is to redefine words. One poor word long ago abandoned as meaningful is “racist”.
Close companions are, “phobia/phobic”, “professor”, and “gender”.
Oh, forgot....democracy.
They changed the defintion because anti-vaxxers were twisting the phrase “to produce immunity” to mean complete or perfect immunity.
Ha! Got a link (not FRAUDci/CDC provided) to confirm THAT ⬆️ whopper?
Even FRAUDci lied that these risky shots would offer *perfect* protection.....so, of course the definition is changed.
Dr. Fauci: There’s evidence COVID-19 vaccines don’t just protect you - they may stop you from spreading the virus to others, too
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3935550/posts
And, even the FRAUDci admitted that true, safe shots take time....to test/trial....as in years....
https://www.bitchute.com/video/z6HmWpb3CQ1r/
(Hat tip to Abe Lincoln)
Why do you keep going with that to denigrate REAL vaccines ?
Buyers remorse?
You’re the one twisting definitions
\
im·mune
/iˈmyo͞on/
resistant to a particular infection or toxin
/
There is immune or not immune,
There is no degree to it, you are or you aren’t or the word loses all meaning.
And before you try and pull the same crap with the word resistant
re·sist
/rəˈzist/
verb
withstand the action or effect of.
( what, did you swap misinformation agent patrol duty watch with duggawayallenduke over there at meta ?)
South African Physician Dr. Shankara Chetty Talks about “The Bigger Plan”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IQoUmvcoiStX/
(Goes hand and hand.)
If that’s the case, then none of the various vaccines we have called vaccines are truly vaccines.
Clearly historical usage of immunity includes partial immunity both in terms of percent of population protected and the degree of protection.
By screwing around with an existing definition the CDC
A. Puts a spotlight on what they’re doing
B. Looks downright Orwellian changing the definition of long standing words
The emails just cement this and show their political bias.
If that’s the case, then none of the various vaccines we have called vaccines are truly vaccines
/\
B.S.
Chickenpox, smallpox, weasels.
As far as historical use, well, liars gonna lie.
The covid vaccine appears to produce complete immunity (they don’t get symptoms) in about 26% of vaccinated relative to the unvaccinated.
—
That could well be the population of individuals who already recovered from a covid infection *prior* to be injected with the vaxx where those people had preexisting natural immunity. Of course the CDC has gone out of its way to blur and ignore the existence of naturally acquired immunity; the result being all the stats they produce for the vaxx are suspect.
Smallpox vaccine was 95% effective.
Chickenpox 90%
Measles 93%
Mumps 60%
Rubella 97%
Smallpox vaccine was 95% effective.
Chickenpox 90%
Measles 93%
Mumps 60%
Rubella 97%
It's good to see that the CDC isn't political or ideological when it comes to their "science."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.