Unless, there is indeed some unknown risk that they are not telling us about that still exists.
Can't have it both ways. Heck, they were able to test their product on tens of millions of humans. That is a real world test with the human population being the Guinea pigs. If that is not good enough, then we should be concerned.
“we are through the rushed testing phase”
Well, we’re in the long term trial stage. I’d say long-term clinical trial but they’re not following the proper rules to call it a clinical trial.
Why are the drug companies not liable?
Because it’s been an insider-information game with government functionaries that have financial interest in Big Pharma. They certainly didn’t want their stocks to be hit by the “bad news to come.” Furthermore, their participation in Big Pharma’s weaponization of Wuhan Flu is largely being hidden in a huge wealth-transfer scheme.
A single 5-day course of Remdesivir costs $2300-$5000 have been used on hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 hospitalizations, despite (even) WHO’s warning that Remdesivir does not decrease the likelihood of death. (Does it increase it? They don’t say.) Nonetheless, Fauxi still recommends it and the government recommends that it still be on US hospital COVID-19 “treatment” protocols.
THIS IS OF COURSE JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF ONE OF FAUXI’s KILLING MACHINE’s SELF-SEVERING LOGICAL DISCONNECTS. But Big Pharma can and has done all manner of extra-legal manipulations of what we used to call FDA-approvable vaccine development. IMHO.
“Why are the drug companies not liable”?
Easy. From wikipedia: ‘The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 was signed into law by United States President Ronald Reagan as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986. NCVIA’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims.’
They are not liable.