Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DFG

I grudgingly agree that using kid-unfriendly language is objectionable. The truth alone, simply stated, should be sufficient condemnation. And putting it into question form helps those who are not-so-bright understand.

“What were you paying for Trump gasoline; what are you paying for Biden gasoline.” “Did Trump threaten you with loss of your job if you failed to comply with his edicts, the way Biden does?” “Would Trump have left billions of dollars worth of equipment and a functioning air base in Afghanistan when withdrawing forces, as Biden did?” “Would China have us over a barrel as they do now with Biden in office, or be held at bay with President Trump?”


43 posted on 10/24/2021 12:35:36 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
"I grudgingly agree that using kid-unfriendly language is objectionable."

Be prepared to get blasted, as I was for making a similar comment when these anti-Biden chants first started happening. Nonetheless, the hypocrisy of the WaPo is astounding.
69 posted on 10/24/2021 1:10:40 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson