Today's show @BlazeTV will make you sick, but I can't help it. Hospitals Are Killing Thousands with Remdesivir https://t.co/sJfgeDqvR6— Daniel Horowitz (@RMConservative) October 22, 2021
Daniel Horowitz has a FANTASTIC podcast - he has interviews with all the top docs on COVID that you’ve heard of (those that treat) & a lot of other docs you’ve never heard of. Great info from all of the docs.
think you could provide us with a condensed, written summary of this HOUR long podcast?
DO NOT GET THE JAB PEOPLE!
With that said, I am sure there are many other people who may need alternative treatments for various reasons, that's why its so important to have as many effective options to treat COVID-19 available as possible.
Horowitz: The $cience of remdesivir vs. ivermectin: A tale of two drugs
“A tale of two drugs. One has become the standard of care at an astronomical cost despite studies showing negative efficacy, despite causing severe renal failure and liver damage, and despite zero use outpatient. The other has been safely administered to billions for river blindness and now hundreds of millions for COVID throughout the world and has turned around people at death’s doorstep for pennies on the dollar. Yet the former – remdesivir – is the standard of care forced upon every patient, while the latter – ivermectin – is scorned and banned in the hospitals and de facto banned in most outpatient settings. But according to the NIH, a doctor has the same right to use ivermectin as to use remdesivir. And it’s time people know the truth.
Although the NIH and the FDA didn’t officially approve ivermectin as standard of care for COVID, it is listed on NIH’s website right under remdesivir as “Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19.” It is accorded the same status, the same sourcing for dosage recommendations, and the same monitoring advice as remdesivir … except according to NIH’s own guidance, remdesivir has a much greater potential for severe reactions in the very organs at stake in a bout with acute COVID.
As you can see, they admit that remdesivir causes renal and liver failure! One of the symptoms is “ALT and AST elevations,” which are indications of liver damage. Is that really the drug you want when someone is at risk for a cytokine storm and thrombosis? They even have a monitoring requirement for these side effects. Also, it does have some drug interactions as well.
Now, let’s move on to the ivermectin side effects.
Notice how the NIH is essentially saying it has no side effects by the fact that it prefaces the section by noting the drug is “generally well tolerated,” a distinction not accorded to remdesivir. Then it proceeds to list the same boilerplate GI and nausea warnings on every drug under the sun. There are almost no drug interactions and ZERO specific guidance for monitoring!”
https://ugolini.co.th/ugolini/horowitz-the-cience-of-remdesivir-vs-ivermectin-a-tale-of-two-drugs/
bump
Absolutely correct in my opinion. This treatment nearly put my mother in law into renal failure. By the grace of God they stopped it, but claimed “we were following protocol”. I’m convinced they want unvaccinated to suffer and die in the hospital. And with no visitors allowed, minimal communication, they could have given her a sex change for all we knew. Absolutely criminal what is going on.
I’ve got a news flash for you. The monoclonal antibody treatment works. I personally know two people who were very seriously ill and left the hospital two days later feeling fine after being treated.
