Thank you.
Always better to read primary sources when available. This is a general rule for history and other fields as well.
Summaries and articles can introduce agendas and bias. At one time, doing this was actually considered poor journalism and/or scholastic practice. In today’s superheated “woke” environment, failing to advocate the “correct” point of view is fatal to one’s career, no matter how distinguished the person.
# Always better to read primary sources when available. This is a general rule for history and other fields as well.
Absolutely. I read through most of them, and the oral arguments when they come up as well. I’ve seen absolute lies about both in the media reporting. The media simply cannot be trusted.