I doubt that the vaccine has “programmed” anything. The natural immune response of the body had not had to develop as the spike protein has somewhat taken it’s place.
The vaccinated were dying at a 1.02% rate (of vaxed cases) while the unvaxed it was 0.28%. So about 3.5 times greater. However, people with poor health may have been more interested in getting the vaccine than healthy people. It would be interesting to know what other health problems the deceased had.
That said - early studies with the “original” SARS “1” vaccines had the test animals getting the wild variants and many (all?) of them dying.
[I doubt that the vaccine has “programmed” anything. The natural immune response of the body had not had to develop as the spike protein has somewhat taken it’s place.
The vaccinated were dying at a 1.02% rate (of vaxed cases) while the unvaxed it was 0.28%. So about 3.5 times greater. However, people with poor health may have been more interested in getting the vaccine than healthy people. It would be interesting to know what other health problems the deceased had.
That said - early studies with the “original” SARS “1” vaccines had the test animals getting the wild variants and many (all?) of them dying.]
Isn’t this what Pfizer said in its FDA Briefing Document for the Booster? https://www.fda.gov/media/152176/download
p22
During initial placebo period, there were 12.6 cases per 1000 person-years, yet subsequent to injection there were 43.4 cases pwer 1000 person years, i.e. 1.3% vs 4.4%
Which Pfizer casually wrote off as other factors being involved for this significant finding. Read paragraph just above 6.4.7