Those links were definitions of a leaky vaccine to answer your accusation that the concept of a leaky vaccine was a conspiracy theory. Those links do not address the MRNA vaccines.
Actual observation finds that COVID reinfection is almost unheard of in previously infected and rather routine among the vaccinated. Yet you persist in your blind faith, ignoring every bit of empirical evidence. Why?
You pretend that vaccines magically provide better protection than the very immune response they are intended to trigger. How?
These are the marks of unbridled arrogance: continually filtering the data to match your expectations rather than matchin your data to actual observation.
to answer your accusation that the concept of a leaky vaccine was a conspiracy theor...
In post 143 I said there have been leaky vaccines.
And one of the links I posted for you details them.
Why would I say they are a conspiracy theory?
What you must mean is that covid vaccines being leaky are a conspiracy theory.
I think we don’t know know yet but so far they are not showing that they are.