Posted on 10/03/2021 6:27:08 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) used his time on the Senate floor to discuss recently released COVID-19 data from Public Health England in the U.K. [DATA pdf Here]
Ironically, Senator Johnson is forced to use the Senate floor to share the information in an effort to stop government and Big Tech censorship of the discussion. Unlike the rest of the nation, the House and Senate chamber rules create a free speech zone that prohibits anyone from censoring congressional debate and discussion.
Senator Johnson outlines data from the U.K. clearly showing the vaccines offer no protection from the claimed Delta variant. COVID-19 is carried and shed by vaccinated individuals. The subsequent rate of COVID-19 hospitalization and COVID-19 death appears unaffected by the vaccine itself. WATCH:
As Senator Johnson notes: 63% of the deaths in the U.K. during the 7 month period being discussed were among the vaccinated population.
It contains a video of Senator Ron Johnson using his Senate floor time to discuss the true nature of the battle with Covid in England. Yes, English data may actually be more honest. Fraud Fauci is not in charge there.
There are some who complain about the GOP, but it seems like there are some like Senator Johnson who are really good at their jobs. Senator Paul and Kennedy also come to mind. Great that they are pushing back against this nonsense in our society; without GOP politicians such as these, and many of our governors, we would find ourselves in the same boat as Australia.
45 Second Twitter Video Clip of Dr. Fauci Saying. ".... asympomatic spread is rare and historically not a driver of outbreaks. Symptomatic people drive outbreaks."
Video clip, 45 seconds in duration, at link. The date of original recording is unknown. A Tweeter on the thread commented that Fauci's remarks in the video were made, "During sars cov 1."
Transcript of Fauci's comments below.
https://twitter.com/MaykelMatias/status/1302442308701429760
"To just add one thing that seems to get lost in that question is that, as Bob said and I agree, we would really like to see the data because if there really is asymptomatic transmission it impacts certain policies that you do regarding screening etc.
But the one thing historically people need to realize, that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.
The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there's a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers" ~ Dr. Fauci
I discovered early in this pandemic that US data was quite different from Israeli data, UK data, Indian data , and much of the rest of the world. As the US began flip flopping on their claims I focused on conclusions from other nations.
Yes, we labeled everything Covid, even if a guy was killed in auto accident.
Dr. Fake Fauci
By the way, he has a medical degree, but think I remember he has not practiced medicine in many years.
Yep
There are no macro stats showing vax success. That’s not to say the technology is a clinical failure, but nonetheless...
An excellent comment from the thread...
“What agency would approve, much less mandate, a seat belt that only works for you if everyone in all the other cars wear it?”
Our country has been hijacked by traitors and we must fight these tyrants.
This is the fourth time I have rebutted the interpretation of this English study. In the UK, people over 65 were vaccinated first. In the study, 40 percent of the vaccinated were over 50 years old. Only 1.4% of the un-vaccinated were over 50 years old. 25 times as many old people in the un-vaccinated group. Not surprising that there were more deaths in the group that was much much older. We don’t know exactly how much older, but covid death risk is 4-6 times higher for every 10 years of age.
see page 14 of the study, if anyone has the patience to read it. It is table 5. Sundance actually has the table in his post. Look at the number of people over 50 and number of people under 50, the first 2 lines of table 5, last 2 columns. OMG this is tiring.
Agree
Absolutely
That would twist the numbers.
I don’t think that will distort the real issue they discuss, the fact that the spike is not caused by the un-vaccinated but by those who were vaccinated but exposed to a mutated strain of the virus, which made them much sicker than those who were un-vaccinated.
The ComDem’s Lie, to promote their own agenda. It is all about the Agenda, not at all about Public Health.
The data from February 1, 2021 to September 12, 2021 shows that it might be considered a pandemic of the unvaccinated for people under 50 years old. But for people over 50 years old, most Covid deaths are among the vaccinated.
Well, I think if the truth was exposed, it is a clinical failure. Because of surprisingly high death rate within 14 days of taking the injection.
Over 50 and after the 2nd dose. = 63.5% of total deaths.
Imagine on Big Island there are 100000 old folks and 100000 young folks.
Let’s say the risk of Covid death is .5% for unvaccinated old folks and .1% for vaccinated old folks.
Let’s say the risk of Covid death is .01% for unvaccinated young folks and .005% for vaccinated young folks.
Imagine 90% of the old folks get vaccinated and 20% of the young folks get vaccinated.
unvaccinated old dead 10000x.5%=50
unvaccinated young dead 80000x.01%=8
vaccinated old dead 90000x.1%=90
vaccinated young dead 20000x.005%=1
The death toll would be 91 vaccinated, 58 unvaccinated.
Johnson is Never Trumper filth.
He gets no credit for ANYTHING, EVER.
Interesting, but after 4 tries you haven’t rebutted anything.
You did provide a possible explanation of an alternative conclusion.
Tee up #5 after more thought…
And may the Force be with you FRiend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.