This would appear to be the principled, one might say “Abrahamic” stand ( as in Lincoln) ruling out the notion that the side of the political divide you do not favor will be ceded a patch of land to live on cut from out of the states or territories of the U.S. I agree, both with your overall refusal to entertain the possibility of a division of land/territory, and with the sharply negative opinion you expressed about the disfavored side. The question then seemingly becomes, whose political view are to be forever engrafted upon the national identity, like as to the northern states or the Union, and whose to be banned or banished, like as to the Southern States or the Confederacy, and how and when and by whom sha this be accomplished? Moreover, won’t this need to be done by means of the rule of law in municipalities, counties, states and FedGov, capped off with a series of Constitutional Amendments? Because is it not so, that once it becomes something to be done by force, it would quickly devolve or resolve into the question: Who controls FedGov?
The other side is not merely “disfavored.” This is the latest flare-up in the eternal war of Good versus Evil. It has once again come down to the forces of evil against the rest of us.
The other side does not have “political views.” They work for Satan, and to a greater or lesser degree, they do his work.
That said, I don’t have a plan. I don’t know what our best move is at this juncture. However, I would say that pre-emptive surrender doesn’t seem to be the optimal strategy.