What does SCOTUS have to do with this?
Haven’t they already stated that these are state issues?
I’m thinking if you give this to SCOTUS, they take it and decide on it, then we’re one step closer to the Dem’s being able to federalize everything knowing they’d be in control of it all.
>> What does SCOTUS have to do with this?
Texas had a beef with Pennsylvania’s shenanigans.
“I’m thinking if you give this to SCOTUS, they take it and decide on it, then we’re one step closer to the Dem’s being able to federalize everything knowing they’d be in control of it all.”
Wrong, not if SCOTUS were to actually follow the Constitution; which admittedly there is no evidence of them being inclined to do.
“Haven’t they already stated that these are state issues?”
No, they only mumbled that in order to avoid their clear Constitutional duty to address and rule on them.