First amendment? You don't need no steenkin' first amendment. Didn't see what would be or could be done to those speaking out and conveying differing information than what the "authorities" are putting out. Simply countering the info proffered or fines? I hear "they" have Reno/Washoe county in their sights next. Anyone? Bueller?
1 posted on
09/22/2021 7:08:06 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
Unfortunately, their definition of misinformation is anything they disagree with...
2 posted on
09/22/2021 7:10:36 AM PDT by
jeffc
(I'm a Patriot, and the media are our enemy)
To: rktman
4 posted on
09/22/2021 7:13:50 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(I got the <ΙΧΘΥΣ>< variant. Catch it. John 3:16)
To: rktman
Good!
We can prove the TRUTH in court.
VAERS under reporting of over 90% of adverse vaccine reactions and deaths.
The uselessness of masks per CDC.
The ineffectiveness of the Vaccines.
5 posted on
09/22/2021 7:15:31 AM PDT by
G Larry
(Those destroying the Constitution must demonize those who would defend it.)
To: rktman
And what, exactly, are these supposed falsehoods?
7 posted on
09/22/2021 7:27:38 AM PDT by
Walrus
(I do not consent)
To: rktman
9 posted on
09/22/2021 7:40:40 AM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
( comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson