Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

Where did you obtain yours?

He generally cites research by those who do have formal medical credentials.

Here, for example:
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243495

Does one need medical credentials to do that?

Like I said before, ignore him at your own peril.


66 posted on 09/06/2021 7:32:54 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring

DuncanWaring wrote: “Where did you obtain yours? He generally cites research by those who do have formal medical credentials.”

I’ve never claimed to have the medical credentials to interpret studies. Dinninger does not have the credentials to support the claims he makes which are little more than the standard anti-vaxxer talking points.

Not only that but Dinninger claims that the JAMA study proves that:
-The jabs are worthless to inhibit the spread of Covid-19.
-If you are jabbed you are just as likely, if not more-likely, to give the virus to others.
- The insistence of jabs in medical settings is now, on the science, converted from “will protect patients” to will, with scientific certainty, screw unvaccinated patients, some of whom cannot be vaccinated and thus now constitutes gross negligence and depraved indifference to human life.

There is nothing in the JAMA study to support those claims. Here are the ‘key points’ and ‘abstract’ from the JAMA Study:

Key Points

Question Based on blood donations in the US from July 2020 through May 2021, how did infection- and vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence vary over time by demographic group and by geographic region?

Findings In this repeated cross-sectional study that included 1 443 519 blood donation specimens from a catchment area representing 74% of the US population, estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence weighted for differences between the study sample and general population increased from 3.5% in July 2020 to 20.2% for infection-induced antibodies and 83.3% for combined infection- and vaccine-induced antibodies in May 2021. Seroprevalence differed by age, race and ethnicity, and geographic region of residence, but these differences changed over the course of the study.

Meaning Based on a sample of blood donations in the US from July 2020 through May 2021, estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence increased over time and varied by age, race and ethnicity, and geographic region.

Abstract
Importance People who have been infected with or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 have reduced risk of subsequent infection, but the proportion of people in the US with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from infection or vaccination is uncertain.

There is nothing there that supports Dinninger’s outlandish claims.


71 posted on 09/06/2021 10:32:38 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson