Posted on 08/27/2021 4:48:46 PM PDT by packagingguy
This is a report on The Conservative Treehouse which includes a newscast from WION TV News out of New Delhi, India. In the deal to distribute the vaccine in poorer countries Pfizer is allegedly requiring said countries put up its sovereign assets, including embassies and military bases, in exchange for the jab.
This was circulated earlier this week. It begs the question, if these reports are true, what is a pharmaceutical company doing trying to obtain military bases?
seems to me that If I wanted to view the contract between Pfizer and the US government, I should be able to under the freedom of information act.
Is this the case I wonder???
How Pfizer tried to bully Argentina and Brazil in exchange for vaccines
MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG
PFIZER EXPORT B.V.,
ALBANIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL PROTECTION
MINISTER OF STATE FOR RECONSTRUCTION
AND
INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH
...Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that (i) Pfizer’s efforts to develop and manufacture the Product are aspirational in nature and subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and (ii) the fact that any other drug or vaccine to prevent, treat or cure COVID-19 infection is successfully developed or granted authorization earlier than the granting of Authorization for the Product shall not change the current situation of urgent needs for prevention of the spread of the COVID-19 infection
that poses serious threats to and harmful effects on the lives and health of the general public...
http://ti-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Albania-Pfizer.pdf
That’s what I looked into and saw it was one of the branches in Shanghai. I don’t believe it was the US operation. At any rate Pfizer does have deep connections with the CCP even if through a subsidiary.
I wonder if they could get China to put up their battle ships.
Sounds like sensationalist journalism to me, originally authored by German socialists who focus on writing anti-capitalist/anti-American content. And glomming onto the anti-gmo/anti-vaccine and specifically anti-Pfitzer hysteria driven by paid charlatans in the EU
Pfitzer may be making “30 billion” from sales, at $15-$20 a pop, but, like all the vaccine manufacturers, they’re giving away billions of vaccines to the UN poor nation program. The UN program can’t be sued, so may be it’s a better choice for nations whose entire socialist culture and mindset is scamming.
and speaking of scamming, WION is India. India stands to make a minimum of $11 Billion profit from their homegrown vaccine. Will they be giving it to nations that would let foreign citizens sue their citizens? Will they be giving it to nations without cash or collateral for credit lines?
Double standard much? LOL
We are a capitalist nation, where profit is not considered a sin. We like profit because profit means good wages. Profit also means shareholders get a piece of the pie. Which spreads that profit wealth around. We’re a land of the highest wages in the world for researchers and scientists and physicians who actually have the freedom to invent. And the world is better for it. We don’t apologize to socialists, so used to government everything they’re frightened of private industry rights on the one hand but secretly drooling over suing an American company on the other.
The snakes a Pfizer should moved their assets offshore, hide their money, and buy a bolt-hole in a foreign country without an extradition treaty with the US because when the scam is revealed they will be on the run and everyone will hate them with a passion.
Pfizer is planning to mulch the dead to make their grass green and they plan on walking over bodies to take what they want.
I want people to make an informed, independent conclusion for themselves. What I posted is one piece of the puzzle.
Profits cannot come from dishonesty, deceit, blackmail, etc. Profits are not the ultimate objective. Please do not be a libertarian as once I was. Just because one pursues profit does not make it a righteous cause.
If it is found that Pfizer committed malfeaseance in its business operations it should be appropriately punished. If the claims presented herein are not correct they should be cast aside as irrelevant arguments.
My purpose was not to take sides but to inform about other possibilities.
BTW anti-GMO is not about GMO’s per se, but around the “green burn” they enable. If you do not know the term look it up. There is a reason European nations are banning it.
Blackrock.
http://ti-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Albania-Pfizer.pdf
Pfizer is the Supplier, countries which sign the contract the Purchaser.
Since when does the supplier write the rules on how the buyer must perform and what the buyers’ responsiblities and liabilities are?
I’m glad it’s not my assets you are spending.
Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that (i) Pfizer’s efforts to develop and manufacture the Product are aspirational in nature and subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and (ii) the fact that any other drug or vaccine to prevent, treat or cure COVID-19 infection is successfully developed or granted authorization earlier than the granting of Authorization for the Product shall not change the current situation of urgent needs for prevention of the spread of the COVID-19 infection that poses serious threats to and harmful effects on the lives and health of the general public.”
2.1b http://ti-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Albania-Pfizer.pdf
me too, that’s why I comment on biased articles
India is looking forward to $11B in profits first year, lord knows how much China has made selling their fake vaccine (or more likely via binding loan shark agreements). I don’t see where Pfiter realizing $30B is a talking point.
It is a strawan, tho, to imply that rich old uncle Pfitzer is evil for asking for collateral for a line of credit in leiu of cash, or asking for the same indemnity for a humanitarian or compassionate use medication that western nations provide. We don’t even have a contract to look at, or whether real estate was offered or asked?
Even your response implies a bias: “ dishonesty, deceit, blackmail...malfeaseance” In who’s court?
“I don’t like your contract it leaves me too exposed financially, you don’t have a valid credit line or insurance, and I’m not going to sign” contains none of the above elements. Pfizter is under no obligation to sell to any country. That’s the bonus of captialism versus nationalized socialist medicine.
I did look up ‘green burn’ but all I found was three pages of telling me how to burn green leaves !! I have no issues with GMO foods btw
thanks
did you bother to read it? You might want to since I’m guessing you’ve never had a business before
you can start at 2.1.a. and d
Pfizer shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to supply blah blah blah technical, clinical, regulatory, manufacturing, shipping, storage, or other challenges or failures blah blah blah Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates...nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product
follow?
2.7 d
blah blah blah Purchaser shall be solely responsible and liable for the proper storage, handling, distribution, transportation, administration, use and disposal of the Product
now we get to the money at 3.2 a
In partial consideration of the Contracted Doses, Purchaser shall pay an upfront payment of $2,997,540 USD (calculated as $12.00USD/dose multiplied by 249,795
of the Contracted Doses) within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from Pfizer... Pfizer shall have no obligation to ship or deliver Product until receipt of the Advance Payment...All such amounts shall be due prior to delivery of the volume of anticipated doses to be delivered .
got that?
then skip down to section 8 - Indemnity
which is pretty much a boilerplate agreement found in most supply contracts
Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors,
licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical
trial researchers, blah blah blah
and 8.2
Assumption of Defense by Purchaser. The Indemnitee(s) shall notify Purchaser of Losses for which it is seeking indemnification pursuant hereto (“Indemnified Claims”). Upon such notification, Purchaser shall promptly assume conduct and control of the defense of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of the Indemnitee with counsel acceptable to Indemnitee(s),blah blah blah
—
That will be $482.37 for contract review. Pay Jim :)
Yet, Pfizer has deals with Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Yurug-waae....did they all sign over “national assets”? This story barely passes the “smell test”. Original version here:
I’ve been involved in enough businesses and owned my own construction company, acting as director and company secretary, to know that I cannot expect my clients to whom I am supplying my services/merchandise, to sign a contract accepting an unproven untested product and any and/or all liabilities should that product turn out to be faulty or injurious to the purchaser, who would then be stipped of all of her/her assetts in the process.
from your home page:
American Exceptionalism
We are not willing to surrender our sovereignty
We are not willing to bend to a foreign army
We are not willing to accept foreign rule
And we will not be reduced to a single shackled voice in a sea of billions
We are the helping hand in a world where tribal homicide is eternal.
We are the inventors, the innovators, the providers, the explorers.
We are endowed by our Creator with inalienable rights.
We are free.
We are The Deplorables
And we will defend our God and our Country and our Freedom
and we will keep our American Exceptionalism
~~~~
Good. That means the US Government never signed a contract such as Pfizer required a number of other countries to sign for the supply of their experimental ‘vaccination’, for which they have emergency use permission ONLY IF NO OTHER TREATMENT IS AVAILABLE.
Probably a “creditworthiness” problem for Argentina and Brazil specifically...provide “collateral”:
https://www.americasquarterly.org/article/argentina-and-the-imf-another-default-in-the-works/
https://commodity.com/data/brazil/debt-clock/
It looks like Pfizer and Brazil worked out a deal after all...to produce under license “in country” and ship part of the production to Argentina (use Google translate if not a Spanish speaker): https://www.clarin.com/sociedad/vacuna-pfizer-brasil-producira-dosis-queria-fabricar-argentina_0_ufE3UFH9z.html
well you’re supplying a service. And I bet you want payment before that roof goes on (or at least part payment or approved credit app from a third-party payer).
The vaccine is a liquid that requires involved handling. If the purchaser neglects to keep it frozen, or gives the wrong dose or adulterates it, how can the supplier control that? the vaccine has known side effects and possible unknown side effects. The purchaser buys the product with full knowledge the treatment is experimental and a hail mary. How does that make the seller liable?
If I sell a vape shop diy supplies, and that vape shop remixes those supplies and then resells them, am I liable if their customer gets pneumonia or pimples? nope. I sold a lab-certified, sealed container. I have no control what that vape shop does with those liquids. If I sell contacts and the optometrist gives a patient the wrong ones that damage the eye, am I liable? nope. If I sell a driveway and tell the owner to water it lightly for 24 hours and he doesn’t and it cracks, am I liable?
In all those cases, the purchaser assumes liability. Why would a vaccine be any different?
“That means the US Government never signed a contract such as Pfizer required a number of other countries to sign for the supply of their experimental ‘vaccination’
sure we did:
Prep Act:
When Immunity from Liability Applies
When the Secretary determines that a threat or condition constitutes a present or credible risk of a future public health emergency, the Secretary may issue a PREP Act declaration. The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration or use of covered countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions identified in the declaration.
Most civilized nations have or passed their one version of a PREP act. Trump signed off and got us vaccines that saved lives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.