Posted on 08/12/2021 8:34:44 AM PDT by White Lives Matter
“What are the chances that the difference in the vote count reported by the media vs the vote count reported in Lindell’s data is exactly 4.2 percent for all the states?”
Lindell’s data is junk sold to him by con artist Dennis Montgomery. It’s meaningless.
“Lindel said he’d pay $5MM to anyone who could discredit his data.”
Lindell can’t provide anyone access to the data, so it’s impossible to credit or discredit it. Dennis Montgomery screwed him.
Larry Johnson was in the CIA....maybe he still is.
China has probably pinged your home router 20 times in che last 24 hours. They do it round the clock, 24/7. So is that proof that you are in cahoots with China ?
There have been more sources than Gateway. Lindell is flailing.
Yep. Header data is part and parcel with packet capture. Ipv4 and IPv6 would be there. The data segment itself might stay encrypted, but the rest of it is still visible.
You would think Lindell would have had Montgomery checked out before getting the data. Montgomery conned Sheriff Arpaio’s investigative team out of 10k when looking into Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate.
One guy. Out of how many?
You would think so, but then again, rich guys sometimes surround themselves with “Yes men” instead of people who will give them good advice, whether they want to hear it or not.
My router doesnt happen to be a voting precinct headquarters. It also denys access thanks to a firewall, so have fun with that. Do The Chicoms get their jollys out of pinging election headquarter precincts on election day to unprotected devices that aren’t supposed to be connected to the internet? There were also data transfer recorded. If all these we just simple pings, which happens at layer 3 the network layer routers operate at, then why not turnover the routers? I mean it was nothing but chinese and Iranians and others just pinging voting Precints headquarters around the countryon election day. Call Maracopa and tell them they have nothing to worry about then....or do they?
It’s proof that I’m connected to the internet.
Lindell was conned. Fake whistle blower with fake data. All used to discredit him forever.
IIRC Lindell said the results would be what everyone was talking about the day after the symposium. He now has less than 24 hrs to prove his case unless we have to wait another two weeks.
Montgomery is a longtime scammer. The only question is whether you believe that Lindell was somehow a huge patsy who was impervious to all those who knew better warning him—or was in on it as well. I certainly don’t know.
The very fact you typed all of that shows you don’t understand the basic point I made.
So the source got scared off. This explains a few things.
Well, Montgomery has a history of conning people by selling them fake data, so I don’t think he got “scared”, he just pulled up his tent stakes and moved on to the next scam.
You didn’t make a point. You made a smartass remark.
He may not have been willingly in on the data scam but thought in the back of his mind “if it turns out to be phony, I’ll still get tons of publicity.. “
Perhaps so. But, don't shoot the salesman. My family was in the jewelry business. Just because a bum under a bridge sells you a shiny rock that looks like gold doesn't mean it isn't real. Let's see how it plays out.
I’m not blaming Lindell, but what I mean is, any analysis that is using that data as a starting point is probably tainted. Garbage in, garbage out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.