Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bearshouse
Which is exactly what the Clerk said.

Did the Clerk have permission to copy the physical hard drives?

Under what statute is she claiming whistleblower status?

7 posted on 08/11/2021 5:23:01 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
Under what statute is she claiming whistleblower status?

I don't think that she ever claimed whistleblower status. She made the decision based on the expose' done by CNN that the 2016 election had been hacked. She had the election server copied before and after the software update and again after the 2020 votes. This seems to have been done to assure that nobody could cheat on her watch.

9 posted on 08/11/2021 5:26:36 PM PDT by Bearshouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Correct. If he does not have a legal basis to be in posession of that data, it matters little about the hardware. If I took proprietary and confidential info from some company, it matters little if I stole an envelope from them to hold the docs in or bought my own at Office Max.


16 posted on 08/11/2021 6:21:06 PM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Did the Clerk have permission to copy the physical hard drives?


I know at least in this state that is public information. The taxpayers paid for those machines and the contents therein. To enter into those machines and change information and delete files is what’s illegal. Those files and information are property of the taxpaying public.


24 posted on 08/11/2021 6:32:10 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson