Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

you anti-vaxxers are a pretty gullible group. This literally “FAKE NEWS’.

Has been debunked which a quick google search will give ample evidence - and if the conspiracy theory believers don’t believe me - then show me the parents, show me the obituary, show me interviews with the devastated family members - perhaps there is a reason this silly blog post had to use a stock image in the article - because there was in fact no 2 year old that died under these circumstances.


13 posted on 08/06/2021 1:25:29 AM PDT by qwerty1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: qwerty1234

I am not an anti-vaxxer per se, but don’t have time to do COVID 24/7.

I try to read a variety of articles.

If you mind linking, or better yet putting up some contrary documented posts, that would be good.


16 posted on 08/06/2021 2:25:28 AM PDT by Hieronymus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: qwerty1234
fact check that you jerk. only a hardcore leftist uses the term anti-vaxxer against people who believe in vaxes but NOT this one. You'r ea gas lighting piece of garbage like the rest of your ilk to use such terms. It don't work here boy.

AMONG MANY

- USA: PRESIDENT CLINTON APOLOGISES FOR SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT

17 posted on 08/06/2021 2:40:01 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: qwerty1234

You understand, don’t you, that Google manages what you see when you search. If they don’t want you to see something, it won’t show up at all, or if it does, it will be way down in the list. But they will always show you “fact checkers” or “debunkers” that agree with their agenda, and protective statements from the company involved.

And yes, that’s what I got from a “quick Google search”. The first return I got was a Reuters “fact check”. Maybe you trust Reuters, I sure don’t.

Assuming this claim is true, could it be that the parents don’t want publicity and refused to allow pictures of their dead child to be released publicly?

Media sources generally decide whether an obituary is published (on-line or in print), and again, if the implications of a person’s death don’t advance their agenda, there will be no obituary at all.


22 posted on 08/06/2021 3:03:18 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Fake news, fake election, fake president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: qwerty1234

Even the form they posted didn’t make sense.

Onset, 3 days.

Hospitalized, No

Days in Hospital, 17 days???

Death in 3 days but 17 days in the Hospital??
There’s more too.

Then there’s those talking about child abuse and charges when they have no idea WHY the child died.

Anyway, this is a hoax and these people see it but something in their brain refuses to admit it.


44 posted on 08/06/2021 7:55:10 AM PDT by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: qwerty1234
how me the parents, show me the obituary, show me interviews with the devastated family members

My, you are naive. Have you ever read a typical legal waiver and non-disclosure agreement that test subjects sign when they receive payment from the pharma companies for agreeing to be a test subject?

I'm wondering how small the payoff was for the parents to sacrifice their children. $200 and free lunch on the day of inoculation? Maybe they pay more for infants. Or maybe less.

55 posted on 08/06/2021 9:08:42 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting late." —Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson