Posted on 07/25/2021 12:30:38 PM PDT by PATed
"But what seemed at the time like a straight-forward approach to the enforcement of existing gun laws has instead become mired in chronic shortcomings, failing for years to make good on its potential. Successive administrations have vowed to fix the problems, but all have fallen short."
(Excerpt) Read more at calmatters.org ...
I don’t think it’s completely absolute. For example, people who are currently in prison shouldn’t be able to have guns. But the California law clearly violates the Second Amendment.
Well, lets see...California...
I bought my first handgun in Cali way back in 1968. Only had to wait three days to pick it up. None of this extra baggage tagged on since.
Must be 21 years of age to buy-Check.
Handgun and rifle registration-Check.
Background checks-Check.
Ban on A-s-s-ault rifles.-Check.
Ten day Waiting Periods-Check.
Red Flag law-Check
FBI checks-check.
Only California approved hand guns allowed-Check.
Tax on ammo-Check.
Background check for ammo purchases-Check.
Age limit of 21 for all guns. Check.
Micro-stamping -Check.
Age limit for ammo-Check.
Gun free zone-Check.
Ban on large magazines-Check.
No private individual sales-Check.
No buying out of state and bringing them into California.
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/what-legal-way-bring-a-firearm-california.htm
So what new scheme and dream will they come up with..
That is the takeaway from the Thirteenth Amendment, as noted.
At least the California gun laws have resulted in my removing a pistol grip from a rifle. That should make everybody in California much safer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.