“According to whom?”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20216934/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26502273/
https://www.materialstoday.com/carbon/news/graphene-oxide-slips-through-the-body/
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/nh/c8nh00174j#!divAbstract
You didn’t mention what part of my entry to display, so I selected a couple of them coming from and going to different parts of the post.
The vaccine has been a big discussion topic since it’s start of use late last year. There are three sides to the fence:
Those who trust it to safely work
Those who mistrust it to safely work
Those that are unsure because the other two supply information that is either incomplete or spins information like a top for agenda. Depends on who you believe. But the operative word here is trust as no one can answer anything but guess on what is and is not safe for every individual. The element of chance.
wy69
I don’t have to trust anything. I took it. I’m fine. I’m glad I did. Course I took the pneumonia shot and the shingles shot as well.....not at the same time
There is nothing in any of those articles that says graphemes doesn’t what you claimed. In fact the slides look nothing like what the Spanish doctor provided
This is like Alex Kones claiming 5G towers were responsible for the severity if COVID
Plus your articles fo not substantiate your claim that a COVID inoculation contains said graphene
A material that is hard to produce and very expensive. Hiw would they figure the needed dose per patient?