“MAYBE......it’s that these experimental, unproven and risky shots DON’T work to prevent.....china virus”
The vaccine makes antibodies in advance - let’s call them the Dallas Cowboys.
The virus has the body make more copies of itself - let’s call them the Washington Redskins.
The Redskins would have an easy time running the ball down the field if there were no Cowboys already.
But even if there are lots of Cowboys, the Redskins can sometimes run the ball down the field.
The more Cowboys on the field initially, the tough it will be for the Skins to score and also to win the game.
The science of vaccination has two centuries of great but not 100% success behind it.
Vaccines are sort of like policing. The bad guys often get away with crime at first. But if more cops are on the beat, the tougher it will be for the bad guys. Vaccinations put lots of antibody cops on the beat before the bad guys(Covid particles) commit the crime of body infection of the vaccinated person, helping nab bad guy body invaders sooner.
Vaccination is a well accepted medical practice - for a reason - it gets good results.
The percentage of US doctors vaccinated is close to 100% and not 0%.
These aren’t vaccines.
These shots are EXPERIMENTAL, UNPROVEN and risky gene therapy agents.
Our longtime family doc has NOT taken these shots, for good reason.
Right; didn't the CDC change the definition of what a vaccine is (with it's guideline changes) about 6-9 months ago, specifically so that they could call the mRNA treatments "vaccines"? It's a bit like redefining "marriage", isn't it? By redefining it, you change it in to something completely different than what it was before.
••••
Dude, can I have your stuff, you probably won't be needing it anyway come next flu season bro...