Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

The following restrictions should be adopted:

1) only a single port available to update a voting machine
2) that port should be double locked (one lock provided per party) and physically unable to be used while locked
3) locks should be applied right after certification of the device.
4) locks should be removed only in the presence of both parties.
5) The first action should be a backup/snapshot of the device when unlocked.

Other restrictions-
All devices to be purchased from US companies and manufactured on US soil

Possession of voting equipment without authorization should be a felony

Prohibit the importation of ballots

Possession of a ballot in any state or federal election without authorization should be prosecuted as a counterfeiting.

All ballots should be marked with manufacture, lot number and date of printing.

All ballots should provide an area where ballot devices can mark to indicate the machine (serial number), action (opened, read, tabulated, etc), and data/time of the action.

All tabulation equipment required to take a digital image of the ballot prior to tabulation.


6 posted on 07/14/2021 10:16:58 AM PDT by taxcontrol (You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

Wrong. No electronic voting. Period.


16 posted on 07/14/2021 10:34:31 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

The federal government already has stringent cybersecurity standards for systems of national interest. IMO voting machines/tabulators would apply as a system of national interest. We should apply the standards. The case could easily be made that it would prevent foreign hacking/meddling in our elections.

air-gapped standalone systems
No wifi/bluetooth hardware/software capability
robust non-alterable logging & auditing
mandatory scans & security updates
software/hardware certification
records retention standards
access controls
cybersecurity training and accountability
etc....

Its all industry standard stuff. Just need someone to say that voting systems are essential to the security of the country (which they obviously are) and mandate that it happens.

Interesting things that I would add are:
- election software should be fully open source and freely available for review
-Paper summary of electronic vote displayed to voter and saved in machine. Just like a cash register (my county already has this)
- If no ID, ballot is provisional (pending verification) with signed identity affidavit, thumbprint & pic of voter attached.
- All ballots should have watermark & unique serial number which matches voter roll. Duplicate votes become provisional pending investigation
- Voting machine output only by screen & uniquely serialized cdrom which must have a chain of custody. Encrypted based on specific machine. Lightscribe label the serial numbers, precinct, totals, timestamp, encrypted machineID on disk.

- Historically problemmatic tabulation sites should have internet firewalls closed to all but essential election ports. All router traffic retained and fully audited. There should be Wifi/cellular jammers in place as well.

Non-tamperable live feed cameras mandatory at tabulation sites.

And State Police with arrest authority also funded to evacuate & secure tabulation sites upon closure. Using FEC grant funding. Lol!

Speaking of which.... where has the FEC been throughout this whole mess???

Just silly ponderings.....


30 posted on 07/14/2021 12:38:51 PM PDT by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson