There were two debates, Sept 29 and Oct 22. The quote was from the second debate.
The fact checker should have stated that. Instead they lied, buried the truth and banned the pages.
Communists.
There were two debates, Sept 29 and Oct 22. The quote was from the second debate.\\
The freaking issue isn’t which debate the liar in chief lied and you know it as well as that scumbag Allen.
“There were two debates, Sept 29 and Oct 22. The quote was from the second debate.”
Regardless, Duke’s “fact checkers” totally blew it, and should have retracted.
It makes no sense for them to use the transcript from the first debate as the basis for denying Biden said something “during the debate”, if was said in the second debate.
The only way they could possibly have been correct in their “fact checking”, is if they had done the fact checking prior to the second debate. That would make them correct, since Biden hadn’t yet made the statement in a debate.
But that would be impossible, unless Posobiec was able to predict Biden would say that exact quote in the upcoming debate.
Okay.
Posobiec said that Alan Duke and his minions working in concert with FaceBook froze his account and accused him of fabricating a quote by Joe Biden from the debate.
Alan Duke says the transcript from September 29th did not contain the quote hence the censorship.
The quote is clearly from the second debate, I looked it up. Did Posobiec say “the first debate”?
Alan Duke appears to be trying to hide behind the fig leaf that Biden didn’t utter the quote in the first debate and may have said it in the second debate, therefore he says Posobiec’s post is faulty and deserving of censorship.
Did Posobiec say on his post “in the FIRST debate Biden said...” because he is clearly wrong if he did, and the snake Duke is going to use that irrelevant fig leaf to cover his tyrannical censorship.
Is it really material if it is in the first or second debate? Because that is a avoid the issue tactic which Leftists commonly use. It seems immaterial to me.
> There were two debates, Sept 29 and Oct 22. The quote was from the second debate.
So they keep insisting that the quote is FALSE without clarifying the trivial detail about which debate.
That in itself is a form of lying.
But we knew that.
Yes, and Posobiec was technically wrong. Why argue something that can be looked up? I believe Posobiec’s recording was from the second debate, which he refused to reveal.
OTOH, would FB fact check a technicality like that from the Left?