>>You take a greater risk with the shot than without.
Bold statement that you can’t back up with any real facts.
The 'real facts' won't be available for some time. As the article states, there was no research even attempted for all age groups, yet, because the vaccine 'product' is still experimental.
BUT the conservative approach that has shown to allow the human population to survive this long is being forsaken; no mention of natural immunization compared to mRNA 'jab' or inclusion in 'reports', and we have seen cheap alternative treatments vilified and debased due to legal consideration that their use would preclude an experimental virus treatment. And the globalists in charge are NOT forthcoming in publicizing all the risks as they become known; it is a mother in a hospital who lost her son to the 'jab' who's treatment was delayed because the mother attributed his condition to the 'jab' and was ignored until the next day when he returned and the 'jab' wasn't mentioned until they examined him first and found his heart so inflamed he was moved to ICU and died. The hospital didn't even know how to report it on VAERS.
Or you can listen to 'vaxxers' who push this poison onto our population without an honest presentation of all the risks they can't understand anyway from the lack of 'facts' available to the public.