Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT Hypes Soros-Funded Group’s $20M Fight Against ‘Republican-Driven Voting Restrictions’
NewsBusters ^ | 6/23/2021 | Joseph Vazquez

Posted on 06/23/2021 4:43:11 AM PDT by JV3MRC

The New York Times acted as the public relations arm for a leftist group funded by far-left billionaire George Soros and its multimillion-dollar efforts to fight voter integrity laws.

The Times propagandized how the radical super PAC Priorities USA was spending a whopping $20 million “to counteract Republican-driven voting restrictions through both digital ad campaigns and legal efforts.” The Times painted Democrats as moral crusaders and Republicans as anti-democratic tyrants: “The initial $20 million investment from Priorities comes as Democrats across the country are struggling to fight back against the Republican push to restrict voting.” The newspaper made no mention, however, of the connection between Soros and Priorities USA. His Democracy PAC gave Priorities USA Action $5,500,000 during the 2020 cycle alone.

In addition, Soros’s Open Society Foundations (OSF) gave the group’s nonprofit affiliate, Priorities USA Foundation, at least $1,500,000 between 2018 and 2019 alone.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: elections; georgesoros; prioritiesusa; voterlaws

1 posted on 06/23/2021 4:43:11 AM PDT by JV3MRC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JV3MRC

A political idea so popular that you have to pay people to vote for it.


2 posted on 06/23/2021 4:45:23 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JV3MRC

$oro$ the DESTABILIZER
GATE$ the DEPOPULATOR


3 posted on 06/23/2021 4:49:02 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JV3MRC

“to counteract Republican-driven voting restrictions through both digital ad campaigns and legal efforts.” There should be voting restrictions. The voter should be alive, they should be a citizen of the United States, and they should be who they say they are and to show identification to prove it. I am FOR voter restrictions.


4 posted on 06/23/2021 4:52:15 AM PDT by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JV3MRC

Democrats don’t have morals it why they are democrats.

Thank goodness for pre internet news they can’t erase their ties to the KKK and Jim Crow.


5 posted on 06/23/2021 8:11:35 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson