Trump 2020 Strategic Advisor Says Constitution Does Not Prohibit Trump Reinstatement (Video)

Conservative US ^ | 06.22.2021 | Kathy Sullivan

[DesertRhino]

There is not one thing in the constitution that protects and cements in place an outright fraud.

[bboop]

If/ when fraud is proven, everything built on sand needs to go. If a murder is found 20 years after the murder, he is still held to account. Time does not erase fraud.

[Mariner]

“If fraud is proven then the entire Biden ticket is then disqualified. He would not in fact be president.”

Stupid people believe that.

The electoral college and the US congress says otherwise.

[Starboard]

The problem is that the GOPe doesn’t want Trump back and will do everything in their power to prevent it, even if massive fraud is proven. Make no mistake, the GOP has no love whatsoever for him — or his supporters. The GOP only wants our votes and our money, not our principles and values.

[egfowler3]

Oh! Okay, thanx for the correction.

[viewfromthefrontier]

No doubt the Swamp has already started thinking of ways to sweep the problem under the rug.

Cue up the next crisis!

[Ann Archy]

They are cooking up the next VIRUS PLANDEMIC as we speak!

[dirtymac]

Correct

[higgmeister]

We’ve all seen Mike went down videos absolute interference and absolutely 90 right?

???   Please explain what you mean?   "Mike went down" and "absolutely 90 right?"   That is gobbledegook Greek to me.

[higgmeister]

The legal and constitutional issues could well be problematic but condoning fraud on such a massive scale would raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the government.

The horrible truth is that the primary goal of the Leftist/Social/Communist insurrection of the last one hundred plus years has been to "raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the government."   As we see now, this is playing right into their hands.   Shame on us if we continue to be duped by their intentional machinations.

[StAnDeliver]

"Today Boris Epshteyn said that no one can state for certain that it would be unconstitutional for former President Donald Trump to be reinstated to the presidency since the U.S. Constitution does not prohibit reinstatement and the issue has never been ruled upon."

And Bannon immediately patted him on the head like the nutty house dog that runs around and eats his own shit.

There is no Constitutional way, as you can hear in Bannon's subtle put-downs of Schlepshteyn, and "lets-move-on", it's a pointless discussion. The de novo case would never reach Cert.

Kennedy's fraud in Chicago and Texas went from suspected to known before Jan. 6, 1961. Made not one bit of difference.

You would have to have a black swan event decapping succession to the point where the 'acceptable solution' to lead the country out of crisis is President Trump. It's not an impossibility (Yellowstone liquid hot magma , or yellowcake liquid hot plasma), but that event would burn down the house you are trying to save.

No, far better to regard 2024 much the way Nixon regarded 1968: "Hail Conqueror, Hail Caesar!"

[Starboard]

“Shame on us if we continue to be duped by their intentional machinations.”

*************

I agree.

When are we going to start holding the people we vote for accountable or results, or at least honest efforts to achieve3 them and make good on their promises? We elect people and let them BS us. That has to end.

Say what you will about the Left but they demand results from their representatives — who are clearly afraid of them. We need to do the same and dump the dupesters.

[StAnDeliver]

"This is the same argument Hillary was using with her supporters as they tried to prove Trump stole the election. They actually were discussing how to transition her into the office once he was gone."

These are the words on the Clue card as to why these Smother-fraud-with-a-Mr-Pillow Bobo-in-the-Boardroom-smoking-a-candlestick Trump-is-President-by-August threads should die a quick death quickly quicker quickest.

[higgmeister]

Have biometric fingerprinting technology , with digital head shot of every individual that drops off a single ballot.

Yes, and we all know The Great and Infallible God ELECTRON would never forsake us.   Hint: anything electronic can and will be manipulated by unscrupulous rascals.

An electronic control of any kind is the very loss of control.   That is why Hackers thrive.

I had a forty year career in telecommunications as a technician, a program and project manager, and retired from Verizon after 31 years.   I'm not just talking-off-the-cuff.

[StAnDeliver]

"There is not one thing in the constitution that protects and cements in place an outright fraud."

On a Federal level alone: Presidential Election of 1824, Presidential Election of 1876, Presidential Election of 1960.

Also TX Senate Election of 1948 (LBJ=fraud), the MN Senate Election of 2008 (Frankentheft), and the IN-8 Congressional Election of 1984 ("Bloody Eighth").

[otness_e]

“The horrible truth is that the primary goal of the Leftist/Social/Communist insurrection of the last one hundred plus years has been to “raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the government.””

Yes, except their plan is to raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the government that ISN’T under their control yet. If they ended up getting people to raise questions of the legitimacy of THEIR government, that WOULDN’T be playing into their hands since that would essentially mean they’re out of a job. Even Lenin when taking control of the Soviet Union by questioning the legitimacy of the government to say the very least made absolute certain that couldn’t be used to evict him and his communist friends from power.

If anything, should they condone fraud, they’re going to very quickly find themselves thrown out by force.

[otness_e]

“The problem is that the GOPe doesn’t want Trump back and will do everything in their power to prevent it, even if massive fraud is proven. Make no mistake, the GOP has no love whatsoever for him — or his supporters. The GOP only wants our votes and our money, not our principles and values.”

Want him back or not, they may end up backing the Trump supporters SOLELY to keep themselves in power and get their votes. Don’t forget, Liz Cheney got evicted from office and replaced with a pro-Trump person, not to mention at least three high-ranking GOP members got censured by their base thanks largely to their bashing Trump. I’m pretty sure they’d be far more scared of royally ticking off the electorate by preventing him going back into office after fraud is proven in order to avoid a repeat of Liz Cheney occurring with them (McConnell, of course, most likely would end up deciding not to support it with the rationale that it’s his last term in office anyways, but the others have too much skin in the game). I know if I were GOPe and lacked the electorate’s principles and values while only caring for their votes and maintaining power, after Liz Cheney’s eviction, I’d be so scared of being evicted by rightly furious Trump supporters that I’d even back Trump going back into office just to ensure I get their votes and maintain my power despite not liking their values and principles, or Trump for that matter.

[Starboard]

I get your points and they are well reasoned. The GOP has no principles and will do whatever they think can keep them in their do-nothing seats.

If you take a look at the FIRST GOP house vote in support of Lizard Cheney it will tell you everything you need to know about the worthless GOP. That’s what they really think. The second vote was strictly CYA for them.

Our elected representatives shouldn’t be voting on the basis of fear. They should be voting on the basis of convictions. We do a terrible job of selecting people for high office.

[otness_e]

“Kennedy’s fraud in Chicago and Texas went from suspected to known before Jan. 6, 1961. Made not one bit of difference.”

To be fair, we also were in the middle of the Cold War during that time, so it would have been extremely stupid to debate over voter fraud when AFAWK the Soviets were planning to nuke us to Kingdom come. Not to mention even Kennedy was very much anti-Soviet/anti-Communist (remember, this was back when there were still Democrats who were genuinely anti-Communist. For example, JFK actually aided McCarthy in nailing communists, just as Nixon took down Alger Hiss), so it wouldn’t have made much difference between JFK and Nixon, voter fraud or legally won.

This is a far cry from what’s going on right now, where we’re affected with a plague deliberately issued by the ChiComs, the current “administration” is refusing to even consider acknowledging the possibility, and Biden, far from being anti-Commie, is not even TRYING to hide that he’s all for the ChiCom takeover of America (heck, even Harry TRUMAN was more anti-Commie than Biden is. At least Truman got us Korea, probably the only genuinely anti-Communist thing he ever did, especially when he sabotaged McCarthy and other anti-Communists every other time).