ransomnote wrote: “Prove she did NOT treat her 340 patients with HCQ with overwhelming success.”
“You’re still using her views on the causes of ovarian cysts to represent ALL of Frontline Doctor’s and their successful work in treating Covid-19. You lie for a living.”
Article Title: “No Evidence That Doctor Group in Viral Video Got Near COVID ‘Front Lines’”
From the aticle:
“The latest viral video promoting COVID-19 misinformation features a newly formed group called America’s Frontline Doctors. About 10 physicians, dressed in white coats with an embroidered America’s Frontline Doctors logo, spoke for 45 minutes in front of the Supreme Court on Monday on a range of COVID-19 talking points, from hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) being curative to the mental health effects of lockdown outweighing the toll of the virus itself.”
“But none of the most vocal members have practices that would place them on the actual front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. Some don’t currently practice at all.”
“Two of those appearing at the Monday event are ophthalmologists, one of whom is no longer licensed.”
“The group’s website, which according to internet records was created on July 16, was de-activated on Tuesday (though past versions can be seen on web archives). Major social media platforms have sought to remove the video from their pages.”
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90533
ransomnote wrote: “Prove she did NOT treat her 340 patients with HCQ with overwhelming success.”
“You’re still using her views on the causes of ovarian cysts to represent ALL of Frontline Doctor’s and their successful work in treating Covid-19. You lie for a living.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
YOU STILL DID NOT PROVE SHE DID NOT TREAT HER 340 patients. Nor have you debunked those doctors.
The article did not prove it nor did it debunk the doctors. It used the same tactic is uses when supposedly ‘debunking’ Trump and all who point out the election was stolen (”no evidence”, ‘baseless’). They all used the same tactic on the Russia Russia Russia hoax. The MSM says there’s no evidence, or the cite their own ‘unnamed sources’.
Obviously you don’t even know what evidence is anymore or you are happy to make claims and lie about having evidence.
So that proves that what they say is false?
Did you really just say that, Broken Record?
For REALS????????
New Rule:
Censorship is proof of falsity.
Welcome to Dogway's Puppet World.
Up is down, right is wrong, water is dry, and birds gotta swim, here in Dogway's Brave New Puppet World.
