Posted on 06/18/2021 8:25:33 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Our team frantically worked around the clock to rebuild our website from scratch while utilizing servers around the world at great expense to our AFLDS team.
We were forced to take immediate action because we will never allow Jeff Bezos and Amazon to censor us from speaking freely about medical treatments, medical studies, individual liberty, or challenging the government narrative surrounding COVID-19 vaccines.
If you would like to help these courageous doctors in their efforts to share the truth and to maintain their website you can donate here
Amazon’s motives are suspect, as they are closely aligned with the Biden Administration due to massive government contracts. These contracts are worth billions, yet Amazon pays almost no corporate taxes.
Jeff Bezos and Amazon cannot argue with our scientific data and facts, so they would rather delete us entirely. We have already been blacklisted on social media, and cannot host videos on YouTube. We must build our own internet servers that cannot be silenced by Big Tech, Big Pharma, or Big Government
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Stella Immanuel also said that ovarian cysts were caused by having dream sex with demons.
Sounds like witches to me.
MD Expat in PA wrote: “Stella Immanuel also said that ovarian cysts were caused by having dream sex with demons.”
Yes, but she supports the unapproved ‘HCQ cure’ for COVID so she is a respected source for the anti-vaxxer cult conspiracists here on Free Republic. They always flock to defend here. Typical defense is “but she’s from Africa and demon sex is a common belief there’. Well, OK, but that does bring her medical expertise into question (except for the anti-vaxxers).
Let them post their stuff all over the web. I hate censorship and the more widely they post it the more people can see how crazy some of their stuff really is
Dirty, dirty peers.
Good thing you don't got an agenda, eh Dogway Puppet?
#GendaGendaWhatsYourGenda
Address the Lancet issue, side-stepping distraction puppet.
Stop with the dancing monkey routine, already.
The Lancet Alters Editorial Practices After Surgisphere Scandal
(excerpt)
The Lancet has announced changes to its editorial policies following the controversial publication and retraction earlier this year of a paper on COVID-19 patients treated with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine. The changes, described in an comment entitled “Learning from a retraction” last Thursday (September 17), include alterations to peer review and other paper acceptance procedures, and have prompted mixed responses from the scientific and science publishing community.
“The proposed changes are a welcome addition, and I am glad to see Lancet implementing them,” Mario Malički, co–editor-in-chief of the journal Research Integrity and Peer Review, writes in an email to The Scientist. “However, they do not answer the questions at the core of the peer review process. How is it that the Lancet’s editorial team and reviewers (including a statistical reviewer) missed what the research community saw when the paper came out, [and] how do the new proposed changes ensure that Lancet or other top journals indeed consult the best reviewers for the studies submitted to them?”
Please advise and contribute your excellent commentary on this respected Scientific, peer reviewed journal. Thanks in advance.
Myerp, myerp.
After this, you still wanna regurgitate their HCQ rhetoric as if it means something?
Goofy puppet. You ain't talking to a room full of derps like you're used to, trollio.
The gene therapy vaccs have not been shown to be safe.
It takes years to prove that. Among other things, they do not know the appropriate dose yet. As required for other vaccines, no dosage studies were done. Also, they did not perform the usual studies to determine how much the vaccines ‘travels’. It turns out for some of them, the amount of vax that stays put at the injection site is 25% of what would be expected for conventional vaccines.
It took 10 years for the new shingles vaccine to be approved and licensed by the FDA. It is a sub-unit vax which is new tech as far as vaccines go.
The gene therapy based SARS-2 vaccs are a combination of sub-unit tech (newish) and RNA tech (novel.
And yet, these gene therapy vaccs are approved for mass consumption in less than 12 months.
Also, the promotion of the gene therapy vaccs and the smearing of alternative safe therapies is done by government and media entities that have been proved to lie and deceive.
Why would you trust them at all?
Atta girl, Mom. See? You ain't all bad. Just all wrong.
There's hope for you yet, if you'll only listen to the smart people 'stead of your masters.
#TakeTheRedPill
I’m deeply saddened by this news.
I thought for sure they were gonna bring back the Penthouse Forum and we can read about sex with ghost and alien probes from the Frontline Freaks.
Trust must be earned.
It cannot be blindly given.
And it is very easy to destroy.
They do it once and get caught, it makes you wonder how often they did it and got away with it simply because, you know, the name and reputation. Nobody is going to challenge them, until one person has the courage to do so and then they are exposed.
And trust and their reputation are destroyed.
You left off the best part. Here, let me help (because I like you).
Yes, but she supports the unapproved 'HCQ cure' for COVICD that WORKS.
Which is the whole point. I don't think alien sex has anything to do with those facts.
You're welcome.
But I will say this. One time I had dream sex with demons, and I woke up with a carrot in my ear.
The world is full of mysteries.
Yes, but she supports the unapproved ‘HCQ cure’ for COVID so she is a respected source for the anti-vaxxer cult conspiracists here on Free Republic. They always flock to defend here. Typical defense is “but she’s from Africa and demon sex is a common belief there’. Well, OK, but that does bring her medical expertise into question (except for the anti-vaxxers).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Her opinion on that issue is not the same as her treatment of patients for ovarian cysts. She can have whatever opinion as to cause she likes as long as her treatment of illness is sound, which it is.
Lots of pointing and yelling “squirrel!” the moment she stated that she had successfully treated 340 Covid patients with HCQ including multiple co-morbidities among the aged. THEN her opinion as to cause of ovarian cysts became the only content the left/shills will discuss, and they cite her opinion (I don’t even know if it’s true, they just keep claiming it) about the cause ovarian cysts to discredit all doctors in America Frontline Doctors, and all their success treating patients with safe, effective medications like HCQ.
If the facts were on your side, you wouldn’t rely on Alinsky smear tactics like you do.
And the CDC, FDA, Big Pharma, the establishment 'medical community' burrocrats, the Federal Government, yada, yada, yada.
But don't worry. Guys like Dogway Puppet will still quote the emperor and compliment him on his stunning outfit.
The world needs its puppets. Who else will entertain us?
Better hightail it before the fire comes. This thread ain't for you.
bagster wrote: “No, not THAT Lancet issue, goofy. THIS Lancet issue:”
Exactly why peer review is so important.
Does Youtube have peer review?
ransomnote wrote: “Her opinion on that issue is not the same as her treatment of patients for ovarian cysts. She can have whatever opinion as to cause she likes as long as her treatment of illness is sound, which it is.”
Oh, but her opinion on demons impregnating women while they sleep is important since it calls into question her medical expertise. I know that’s hard for you to admit since you want to believe in HCQ. BTW, has she published any verifiable and documented evidence of her curing COVID? (A youtube video doesn’t count.)
Male nurses work under a lot of stress. It can be very hard on their countenance.
13foxtrot wrote: “The gene therapy vaccs have not been shown to be safe. It takes years to prove that. “
Over 317 million doses administered has proven their safety far better than a ten year study with far fewer participants.
Haha. That's your retort?
Your esteemed 'source' is outed as a farce, and you come back with 'peer review is important'?
Bro. 'peer review' is a JOKE, as illustrated by the Lancet 'incident'. Yet you cling to it like a fat kid with the last candy bar.
I'm starting to think YOU'RE a joke.
But my opinion is pending peer review.
Myerp.
Keep saying 'peer review'. It makes me laugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.