B) This is a case where the person got the “vaccine” and died of Covid, but the cause of death is given as “Covid”. (Would any of us even know if the deciding factor is the “vaccine”, if the death is simply being reported as a “Covid” death?)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ve been thinking about this. The CDC’s ridiculous invented rule implemented at the start of the Plandemic was that anyone who died for any reason, within 60 days of positive PCR test, was to be coded a “covid death.” At a news conference, a reporter asked, “what about motor cycle accident” and the spokesperson said it would be a covid death but reminded reporters that this kind of unrelated death would surely be insignificantly small.
The problem, well one of them, in the addition to the fact no other epidemic has been treated this way in the past, is the the CDC decided to run the PCR tests at a cycle rate that would render 97% false positives. So the CDC planned in advance to boost the Covid death rate high enough to fan panic and for them to strip us of our Constitutional rights.
But maybe it was also implemented in advance to hide ‘break through’ rates and ADE (a problem with this type of vaccine) illnesses and deaths. ADE can result after vaccination (documented in numerous research studies) and can look like Covid but it’s actually over-reaction to Covid.
So now either break through infection/death or vaccine promoted ADE (over reaction to exposure to a virus) can, by that 60 day rule, shift deaths into the original “Covid” death count.
Which is the problem with all of this.
We're really on our own. Those that are supposed to be doing their work without any concern over the direction in which facts point (the medical authorities and the journalists being the most obvious ones) aren't. So we're left with making medical decisions based on a combination of skepticism and word-of-mouth hearsay, which is probably one step above an old wives' tale.