Skip to comments.
“Smoking Gun” Proof Of Election Fraud in New Hampshire
Populist Press ^
| 05/30/2021
Posted on 05/30/2021 10:48:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
On May 27th, The auditors in New Hampshire claimed that they found no fraud or evidence that machines were tampered with.
From Union Leader:
A forensic audit of automated vote counting machines in Windham revealed no evidence of fraud or tampering with those devices, officials said Thursday.
The work of the first-ever audit of a New Hampshire election ended Thursday with the team standing by its initial finding that folds made in paper ballots were the major contributor to a wide discrepancy between results that were reported on election night and a hand recount done nine days later in local House races.
Now, we have this.
Marylyn Todd, founder of the New Hampshire Voter Integrity Group is pushing back on this claiming that she has discovered proof of election fraud in New Hampshire.
From OANN:
Marylyn Todd, founder of the New Hampshire Voter Integrity Group, said she’s discovered “smoking gun” proof of election fraud in New Hampshire.
On a live stream Thursday evening, Todd said she encountered something extremely problematic about the May 12 audit report from Harri Hursti, the electronic voting security expert leading the Windham County audit.
Todd expressed how Hursti conveyed to her that he couldn’t clear the counters and that instead, he had to reset the memory cards. Todd said this was confusing to her because she recalled he had a “clear counter” button the entire time, therefore there was no need to delete the memory card. She then stated that Hursti is on camera saying the computer needed to be registered for Nov. 3.
She went on to explain that Hursti appeared to reset the date to Nov. 5 before printing the report. Hursti’s apparent actions coincide with Michigan attorney Matt Deperno’s findings in Antrim County.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 20201103; 20201105; audit; electionfraud; folds; newhampshire; nh; reset; windham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Mr. N. Wolfe
Being a democRAT means never having to pay for your “mistakes.”
21
posted on
05/30/2021 12:24:57 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: Texas Fossil
Yes:
On May 27th, The auditors in New Hampshire claimed that they found no fraud or evidence that machines were tampered with.
22
posted on
05/30/2021 12:54:33 PM PDT
by
stanne
To: Lurkinanloomin
The GOP has been playing along since the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment. There is still hope it’s called the Constitutional Convention with the express purpose of repealing the 17th Amendment. The uniparty is built on the 17th Amendment
23
posted on
05/30/2021 1:41:27 PM PDT
by
Article10
(Roger That)
To: stanne
Source?
Hint: Do not reference CNN.
24
posted on
05/30/2021 2:35:40 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: SeekAndFind
25
posted on
05/30/2021 2:36:21 PM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(THE DEEP STATE HATES US! IT DETESTS TRUMP!!)
To: Dick Bachert
They say “don’t tread on me”, now what will they do about it? My bet is nothing.
26
posted on
05/30/2021 2:38:27 PM PDT
by
kenmcg
(tHE WHOLE )
To: kenmcg
We know they stole it. They know we know they stole it. We are now at the point where they’re saying “yeah, so, what are you gonna do about it, punks”?
27
posted on
05/30/2021 3:03:28 PM PDT
by
myerson
(It ain't brain surgery.)
To: SeekAndFind
Isn’t it something how many ways electronic voting and tabulation can be manipulated before during and after an election. Nothing is more easy to cheat.
28
posted on
05/30/2021 3:05:09 PM PDT
by
Revel
To: SeekAndFind
paging Charles Bronson, please pick up the courtesy phone.../s
29
posted on
05/30/2021 3:10:11 PM PDT
by
rolling_stone
(usa nice experiment ruined by "progressives'" )
To: SeekAndFind
And what will be done about it?
30
posted on
05/30/2021 3:14:11 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters. )
To: SeekAndFind
Well that explains it (not)
31
posted on
05/30/2021 4:00:16 PM PDT
by
12chachacha
(Bad illogical advice)
To: kiryandil
You need to look at the votes on a town by town basis, since there is a big difference in voting patterns between individual towns in Rockingham and Hillsborough counties.
Liberal towns like Exeter and Portsmouth voted heavily for Joe Biden. Other towns voted heavily for Trump.
If you want to do serious research into how each party got as many votes as they did you need to look town by town.
To: Revel
Isn’t it something how many ways electronic voting and tabulation can be manipulated before during and after an election. Nothing is more easy to cheat. That might be true, but in this case the voting was done on paper ballots which were hand counted in the recount and in the audit with the same result from each count. There has not been any suggestion from anyone that the set of ballots in Windham are not the same ballots submitted by the voters in Windham.
Paper ballots with careful, transparent absentee and in person voter verification provide about the best voting method.
To: freeandfreezing
Also compare the vote counts by county for 2008, 2012, 2016 and 2020.
I did a spread sheet comparing 2016 and 2020.
The "other" category dropped from 5% in 2016 to 1% in 2020.
It would be illuminating to find out from the "other" voters how they actually voted in 2020.
34
posted on
05/30/2021 4:48:28 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: kiryandil
To understand voting in New Hampshire you need to look at town by town results - not just the county by county totals.
To: freeandfreezing
Which you haven't done.
Thanks for your "insight".
36
posted on
05/31/2021 8:15:46 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: kiryandil
Which you haven't done. How do you know? You don't. I have done more analysis of New Hampshire election results than most people. Way more than you, or I wouldn't have to tell you the obvious.
And by the way, take my suggestion as a friendly hint if you are actually trying to do anything useful. Try looking at the absentee ballot patterns in certain precincts in liberal towns.
To: freeandfreezing; BobL
Thanks for not sharing your research with us.
I like to share mine.
Try looking at the absentee ballot patterns in certain precincts in liberal towns.
Now, this is an actual working tip that someone can use. Not a simple "nay", with little to work with.
I see that you also do election analysis, like me.
Here's a hot tip someone gave me, and I checked it out.
Still haven't come to a final conclusion, but it's old data, and will keep till I get around to it:
============================
BobL wrote [January 2021]:
It wasn’t long ago that Missouri was considered a swing state - then almost overnight it became a strong Republican state (+10). I always wondered why the state changed so quickly.
No it’s OBVIOUS to me. There is a limit to how many votes the Dems can manufacture with their control of vote counting in the large cities. Missouri crept past that limit, so the Dems shut down operations there (why bother, at that point)...hence Missouri’s vote tallies instantly represented real voters. With Texas, they have more room to ‘up their votes’, so they’re going after it like made.
Anyway, they have control of enough swing states to not matter anymore, so now the only question for people on our side is whether we can get out [of the] US, or at least get our money out of the US before the death spiral hits this country.
============================
The way to verify this is compare the 2008 and 2012 elections in Missouri, and then the succeeding 2016 and 2020 elections.
In the runup to the 2008 election, Missouri [which is one of those "rogue" states like New Hampshire with lots of 3rd party voters] was always in the swing state column because of Perot in 1992 [22%] and 1996 [10%], Bush by only 79k in 2000. In 2004, Bush crushed John Heinz by 200k.
Finally, in the last gasp of the Missouri Democrat vote factories, McLame beat The Lightbringer by 4,000 votes in 2008.
That's when the MO Dems threw in the towel.
In 2012 against Milt Dumbney, The Grinnin Kenyan lost by 260k votes - a total surrender.
In 2016, President Trump turned Cankles into bloody jam - she lost by 525k votes.
Even joek and The Ho could only manage a 465k loss in 2020.
You can clearly see the high water mark in 2008. It's interesting that they appear to have been rigging even some of the red counties in Missouri.
Still haven't fully analysed that.
38
posted on
05/31/2021 7:40:34 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson