Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: White Lives Matter
The County Attorney's letter is surprising since her purported "clients" are government employees threatening to bring litigation against another branch of the Arizona government. It is also surprising since she states that the Senate audit representative wrote:

"This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena…[t]his suggests that the main database for all election related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed.”

And then states that:

"Our clients delivered the server exactly as it was kept by the Maricopa County ElectionsDepartment. Nothing was deleted, or added, from the server when we prepared it to be sent to the Senate pursuant to the Senate’s subpoena."

But apparently didn't read the technical report published by those same clients at the election office that said:

"In accordance with the standard database archival processes, the data files (MDF file type) were moved to a backup hard drive in February to ensure the server had sufficient space to perform the statutory mandated March Jurisdictional Election."

The county attorney's statement appears to be true when carefully parsed. No doubt nothing was "deleted" when they prepared to send the server to the Senate, since the database in question had already been removed by the election office in what they contend was normal operations.

But that doesn't make the statement that the files were deleted untrue. Moving the files from the server is the same as removing them from the provided server from the perspective of the person receiving the server in response to a subpoena.

19 posted on 05/21/2021 5:28:08 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freeandfreezing
But apparently didn't read the technical report published by those same clients at the election office that said:

"In accordance with the standard database archival processes, the data files (MDF file type) were moved to a backup hard drive in February to ensure the server had sufficient space to perform the statutory mandated March Jurisdictional Election."

The county attorney's statement appears to be true when carefully parsed. No doubt nothing was "deleted" when they prepared to send the server to the Senate, since the database in question had already been removed by the election office in what they contend was normal operations.

I watched and listened carefully to both the BoS meeting on Monday and the Senate hearing Tuesday as well as reading the statement regarding "moving" the database. I thought the same thing as you, they were creating wiggle room with that statement and know they needed to. IMO, they know we know they cheated.

I downloaded and searched the Arizona Elections Procedures Manual and searched for those type of keywords (archive, backup, back up, database, etc.) and no results were used in the context of moving a database file. My guess is they aren't getting much sleep at night.

22 posted on 05/21/2021 5:46:53 PM PDT by Mr.FixIt (Ethanol: Growing in four months what the U.S.A. burns in one day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: freeandfreezing

“In accordance with the standard database archival processes, the data files (MDF file type) were moved to a backup hard drive in February to ensure the server had sufficient space to perform the statutory mandated March Jurisdictional Election.”


Interesting. That doesn’t appear to line up with the April 12th date.


30 posted on 05/21/2021 8:53:36 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson