[2aProtectsTheRest]

The only methods for removing a sitting US President from office within the framework of the US Constitution are impeachment (that isn’t happening) and the 25th Amendment (also not happening.

He has the office for now. Let the audits demonstrate to the American people that fraud is not only possible, but actually took place, and the backlash will be absolutely devastating for the Democrats in the coming elections. Nobody likes a cheat.

[Dr. Franklin]

The only methods for removing a sitting US President from office within the framework of the US Constitution are impeachment (that isn’t happening) and the 25th Amendment (also not happening.

Actually, the writ of quo warranto can issue to remove a pretender from office. That has a constitutional basis:
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..."
U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Sec. 1, The Guarantee Clause

When the a state official, or the U.S. Congress, knowingly certifies a fraudulent election, they violate the U.S. Constitution. Judges who invent equitable defenses to that legal right of the citizenry, also violate the constitution and should be impeached. When no government official will remedy the obvious fraud, then the "other unspoken option" is always on the table.

[Hostage]

> “The only methods for removing a sitting US President from office within the framework of the US Constitution are impeachment (that isn’t happening) and the 25th Amendment (also not happening.”

Those are indeed methods for removal of a legitimate President.

But removing a delegitimate President CAN BE done by Quo Warranto.

CAN BE = Not barred by any law