Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo
But it doesn't say in the Constitution that a sitting President can be removed by a court if fraud is uncovered. If fraud is uncovered, then that is a "High Crime and Misdemeanor," and the President can only be removed by being impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.

The Constitution doesn't use the term "sitting" President. Somebody is either a legitimate president or they aren't.

If it is determined in a court of law that the certification was based on fraud, then the imposter president isn't president, and the Impeachment and Removal clause shouldn't be required.

147 posted on 05/21/2021 1:20:46 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
The Constitution doesn't use the term "sitting" President. Somebody is either a legitimate president or they aren't.

The Constitution doesn't use the term "legitimate" either.

156 posted on 05/21/2021 1:49:39 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson