Replies

The auditors answered her question as to when the audit would be complete, they answered “we expect by the end of June”. So it’s not a hard date.

The problem within the AZ State Legislature is that each chamber has only a +1 majority and one of the AZ GOP Senators is a turncoat, Paull Boyer. He’s being recalled and signatures are due by mid-June. A recall may or may not force his hand when it comes time for the legislature to take action.

1. The Maricopa Sheriff is a lefty.
2. The AZ AG is a fence-sitter nodding to the Never-Trump clique.
3. The Governor is not a friend of the Trump movement.

The Senate’s leverage is limited.

The most important result coming out of AZ is not throwing the MCBOS in jail (although our emotions would love to see it) because the AZ Legislature is not going to vote to do that unless Arizonans get in their grill frequently and even then some of the legislators will pay lip service and cast blame somewhere else.

I view the most important result out of AZ to be the legislature’s report and new election reform laws. I wish it was more but I don’t think AZ will be the state that slams it down like to needs to be done. I just don’t think AZ has the enforcement muscle but I could be wrong and I hope I’m wrong.

Quo Warranto is planned, an attack plan is already in existence with it as the objective. It’s not me saying it.

The AZ Senate is calling for an extension to see what other elected offices could be brought under the microscope. This could possibly bring them more leverage because like so many other ‘red states’, it’s a good bet that their ranks have been infiltrated by persons in office due to machine voting.

But it’s probably going to be another state or group of states like GA, PA, MI, WI, NH that follow AZ’s lead for a full forensic audit, then as momentum builds it becomes a Quo Warranto movement.

When the other dominoes (states) begin to fall, one of the other states will forge a complaint to SCOTUS in a Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto, all the states will back that and join other groups to push it.

The petition for a writ of quo warranto by statute must be filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It is not within the original jurisdiction of SCOTUS. SCOTUS rejected its original jurisdiction when it refused to hear the Texas v. Pennsylvania case. SCOTUS can hear appeals from the U.S. District Courts, issue prerogative writs, but quo warranto isn't one of them.

The AZ Senate is calling for an extension to see what other elected offices could be brought under the microscope. This could possibly bring them more leverage because like so many other ‘red states’, it’s a good bet that their ranks have been infiltrated by persons in office due to machine voting.

The theory is that the local pols get the machines so they can guarantee themselves reelection. It will be curious to see if that theory has validity.