[gas_dr]

It couldn’t be that someone is truing to cash in on fame. This is not news. This is a New York Times headline. There is no credible source or evidence in evidence

There is lots of evidence that these are safe and effective vaccines. There is in fact evidence of breakthrough infection. There is no attack on the messenger as bagster says. But it is reasonable to evaluate the strength of the evidence

Three conditions of Socratic discussion: Intelligence. Candor. Good will. This tiktok lacks all three and ergo cannot be considered as credible.

[bagster]

There is lots of evidence that these are safe and effective vaccines.

And there is lots of evidence that they are not. ALSO, lots of evidence that they don't even work.

There is no attack on the messenger as bagster says.

Pardon me, Gassie. But that's pretty much all you guys got. Attack the messenger. Everybody is a quack, insincere, unintelligent, etc. Tik Tok is the medium. YouTube is the medium.

You people attack the messenger AND the medium to make your case.

In the meantime, the actual message goes unanswered by most of you vax pushers.

[bagster]