Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1; All
Dr. Frank’s analysis is completely useless. He doesn’t know the difference between a vote cast in person and a mail in ballot. Asserting that 20% of the total ballots cast were mail in ballots sent to PO Boxes isn’t evidence, it’s ridiculous speculation.

"We can see in each of these graphs that there is a near perfect turnout consistently between the ages of 65 to 80. (Except Forest Home and Mancelona. .
[Chart shows totals: 4,901 total ballots 3,019 mail in ballots with a percentage 20.3% of all ballots were mailed in ballots]
One may wonder what is causing a near 100% turnout in these age groups. We believe it directly correlates to the fact that 20.3% of all ballots in Antrim County were sent to PO Boxes as demonstratred in the chart above."

Plaintiff's Collective Response To Defendants' and Non-Party Townships' Motions To Quash And For Protective Orders, pg. 9=10

So which numbers in the Antrim County database are you disputing? The number of mail-in ballots, or the number of ballots cast? Again there are 1,061 more ballots counted than there were voters. The 20.3% of all ballots cast being mail-in ballots only decreases if we accept that those phantom voters cast legal votes. Is that what you are arguing here with your pettifogging?
20 posted on 05/08/2021 3:00:25 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Franklin
On page 10 of the filing...

"One may wonder what is causing a near 100% turnout in these age groups. We believe it directly correlates to the fact that 20.3% of all ballots in Antrim County were sent to PO boxes as demonstrated in the chart above. As we see in the chart below, there were 15,962 ballots present at the hand recount on December 17,2020."

Of the 15,962 ballots cast I want to know how many absentee ballots were cast and how many in-person ballots were cast. Why? Because his allegations that 20.3% of the ballots were absentee ballots is an EXTRAORDINARY claim, which requires proof. I have doubts that this sparsely populated county even has 3,019 PO boxes.

I should also mention his 2019 census data is nearly useless because it is estimated from the 2010 census and the estimated data has not necessarily updated every year. According to the Census bureau the estimates may be five years old. It's relevance is also dubious.

Speaking of the census data, why did Frank break down the data by age group and then interpolate the data into six age groups. What was the purpose!?

The correlation factor between the number of people who voted and registered voters is always highly correlated. If you took data from years ago, long before voting machines existed, and ran it through correlation formula you would get the same results as Frank did. Why would anyone be surprised by this?

Older voters do have 90%+ turnout rates. Not unusual at all. The problem with his contention that the sizable portion of these 3,019 ballots were all sent to PO boxes presumably because they were dead voters would require that nearly everyone over 65 was dead.

Finally Dr. Frank will not release the "magic key" nor the secret formula for applying it. That's not what honest analysts do.

36 posted on 05/09/2021 5:41:17 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson