Posted on 05/05/2021 1:30:48 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
Matthew DePerno, constitutional attorney in Michigan, revealed the forensic evidence shows Dominion voting machines had an unauthorized implant installed to circumvent its own security features.
DePerno said forensic images obtained in December 2020 show machines were connected to the internet, and evidence of “even remnants of foreign connections.”
“We’re the only case in the country that’s been actually able to look at forensic images,” he told War Room, Wednesday. “Dec. 6, 2020 we went into Antrim County and collected forensic images of [Dominion’s] election management system. We’ve been studying them since that time.”
DePerno and his team say they have “proof that voting machines used in the 2020 elections can be compromised and votes easily transferred from one candidate to another.”
DePerno said they uncovered a Microsoft “implant” installed on the machines that was not authorized by the election commission, “which means the actual system itself would be decertified.”
(Excerpt) Read more at warroom.org ...
It’s cute that you have a pet name for your old lady.
Is that better than JohnThomas8?
Well we do. All of the Antrim County audit reports have been released. The Haldeman report said, "Vote tally changes can be explained by examination of how software manages the reference ID’s in the ChoiceManifestation table."
The clerk specifically said that she didn't know she had to update all the systems.
That is correct. She or someone in her office failed to follow the instructions and update all the systems. The actual incident was prompted by the late addition of a ballot issue. A user error. Perhaps the instructions weren't clear. In any case there has been no evidence of any malicious intent.
Thanks for the info.
Trying to analyse every single line of code, or what is certified or what isn’t, including the operating system, on any Microsoft system, I should think is an impossible task (even they no longer understand how some of it works).
Of course, if you have the necessary admin access rights and the physical access, either hands-on or remote access - whether that be wired or wireless (and these days wireless connections can be something concealed within a chip on a circuit board) - then any data can me manipulated.
Whether that manipulation can be detected depends on what audit trail the original software creates. That’s what the investigators need to validate against.
The best way of course is to use bits of paper and a dab of blue dye on your finger as you vote; but that would be sexist or something.
Chippy got a boob job.
Not to my knowledge. But the code does not need to be MSFT's.
It was described as a Microsoft implan and I assumed they were wrong about the second term. But if it an non-MS implant targetting MS systems, that would be very serious. But I doubt that's the case.
I don't know, maybe.
Is that the dude from the Waltons?
Yes, that is technically correct, which is the best kind of correct!
NeverTrump like that dude gonna NeverTrump...
Yeah? Did Antrim County call you and impart this particular information to you?
Or maybe you work in the Antrim County offices... ;-)
With physical access you could bring up command line sql and connect as the “sa” user to the master db. Then change anything.
I don't even have to address that particular conspiracy theory. Why? The Antrim County voting machines were not connected to the internet.
The Haldeman audit report stated...
"Antrim County did not purchase and does not use the Dominion wireless results transmission functionality."
and...
"Based on the EMS event log, it does not appear that the EMS has ever been connected to a network."
I personally believe that the originator of the Italy conspiracy theory, Maria Strollo Zack, is a fraud and her affidavit is fake.
1) It is written in English.
2) It isn't notarized which is required in Italy
3) Arturo D'Elia's lawyer was asked about it and has never heard of the lawyer listed on the affidavit.
4) No Italian news organization that covered the trial reported this "bombshell" testimony.
The information comes from both the Cyber Ninjas and Halderman audit reports. Maybe they are in on the "election fix" too. ;-)
Can you put that Genie back in the bottle?
Got a link to both of those sources? ;-)
That's J. Alex Halderman.
Haldeman (and his report) is the "expert" witness for hack MI SOS Jocelyn Benson. Haldeman is the same U of Michigan professor who NYMag claims said that the 2016 elections may have been hacked against Hillary in WI, MI and PA.
Gabriel Sherman | Nov. 22, 2016
Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private. Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.
We don't know if the updating of all the systems solved a problem or covered up a problem.
Without looking at all the evidence, and actually seeing the Dominion source code, we don't know either way.
We do know that the results were initially off.
We may see in Arizona and then in audits in other states, the same pattern.
It's very much TBD.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.