Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did this ghoul just spill the beans??
Wayne Dupree Media ^ | April 25,2021 | Missy Crane

Posted on 04/26/2021 5:34:07 AM PDT by TrueMIGirl77

Bill Gates is not a doctor, or a scientist, or a politician.Yes, I am sure you already know this, but in this day and age, where he’s treated like all of the above, it’s worth repeating.Gates is a really, really rich nerd who makes computer software, and mosquito nets, yet somehow he’s been hailed a “scientific doctor politician” who has an awful lot to say about our nation’s health and politics.It seems like whenever there’s a discussion on COVID and vaccines and how to properly handle this “pandemic,” Mr. Gates is in the middle of that convo. Many people find this to be disturbing, especially since Gates is infamous for his “population control” stance.Sure, there can be a legit debate about controlling exploding populations in certain areas of the world where they can’t sustain a certain quality of human life, but when that conversation is presented by a guy who is pushing vaccines, it can understandably creep people out.

(Excerpt) Read more at waynedupree.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: billgates; covid; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; microsoft; pandemic; stevenkoonin; waynedupreepimp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: one guy in new jersey

Ted Talk:

Video here:

https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/transcript

Go to 4:21


21 posted on 04/26/2021 10:45:16 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (Rigged Elections have Consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Vaccines are supposed to preserve life, not inhibit it, or prevent it. What was Gates getting at? I ask this with full knowledge of Gate’s utter devotion to battling so-called “human overpopulation”, so it’s not as if I’m a Polyanna when it comes to Bill Gates. How does one advocate, in polite company, for the use of “vaccines” for that purpose? Are you not admitting that whatever it is, it is not a vaccine, but instead a poison, or a sterilant? I’m asking seriously. Imagine that there is an innocent explanation for his remark. What might it be? Because I’m not coming up with anything on my end.


22 posted on 04/26/2021 11:54:10 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Ping


23 posted on 04/26/2021 11:56:34 AM PDT by Taxman (SAVE AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Here’s a potential innocent explanation.

If people in the poorest countries were given ready access to a full complement of safe and effective vaccines for administration to their children as they have them or bear them, those people will have greater confidence that the children they have or bear will avoid death as children and thus survive into adulthood. With greater “success” in rearing children who manage to survive into adulthood, they will feel less pressure to have or bear large numbers of children as a hedge against premature death. Thus they will naturally choose to have or bear fewer children. This result can thus be said to be due at least in part to the beneficial impact of effective and broadly available vaccine technology.

Is Gates saying this?


24 posted on 04/26/2021 12:10:30 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson