Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham
"The first proposals for direct election of Senators began as early as 1826, so while fixating on the Progressives is always popular sport it ignores history."

It matters, because unlike earlier proposals, the Progressives had growing government and undermining the Constitution as a specific goal. Earlier generations were merely trying to bring consistency to senatorial election, and had no anti-Constitutional intent.

It's in their own writing, the progressives. They were DONE with the Constitution. And still are, BTW.

27 posted on 04/19/2021 7:13:54 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (Public meetings are superior to newspapers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: ProgressingAmerica

It doesn’t matter that Progressives advocated direct election when it had already been proposed in Congress for over 90 years, long before Progressives were even born.

Election by state legislatures had its own problems that were well known.

It was a policy no more written in stone than any other feature found in the Articles of Confederation.

The Philadelphia convention jettisoned state legislature election for the House. There’s no reason that the policy is any better when used for the Senate since either way each State gets equal representation in that chamber.


29 posted on 04/19/2021 8:20:42 AM PDT by Pelham (Liberate the Democrats from their Communist occupation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson