Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Onthebrink

Hood was a battle cruiser. She should have never been put anywhere near a real battleship. It was practically criminal that she was.


2 posted on 04/14/2021 10:12:38 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne
Hood was a battle cruiser. She should have never been put anywhere near a real battleship. It was practically criminal that she was.

The US built two battlecruisers, the Alaska and the Guam. They were originally designed not to take on battleships but to hunt down cruisers and "pocket battleships" that the Germans were building. However, by the time they were launched, most of the enemy's cruisers were gone, so they were used mostly for shore bombardment and escort duty.

12 posted on 04/14/2021 10:34:44 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne

Hood was a battle cruiser. She should have never been put anywhere near a real battleship. It was practically criminal that she was.


Perhaps. But when you’re enemy (Germany) is dictating the terms of the fight, then mismatches are bound to occur. If the Prince of Wales had been able to contribute more to the fight then the Hood may not have been lost.

Similar thing happened at the 2nd Battle of Guadalcanal when the USS Washington got left holding the bag when the South Dakota experienced electrical problems. But the Washington was expertly conned by her skipper and Adm Lee knew more about the practical problems of night-fighting with radar than the experts did. Different outcome.


33 posted on 04/14/2021 11:52:48 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson