Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Scrambler Bob

If the “archive” of the internet can be edited, how can it be relied on as accurate??


28 posted on 03/23/2021 9:39:04 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze
From 1984 (or at least today's version of it. It might be edited by tomorrow)

This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs--to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct, nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary. In no case would it have been possible, once the deed was done, to prove that any falsification had taken place. The largest section of the Records Department, far larger than the one on which Winston worked, consisted simply of persons whose duty it was to track down and collect all copies of books, newspapers, and other documents which had been superseded and were due for destruction. A number of 'The Times' which might, because of changes in political alignment, or mistaken prophecies uttered by Big Brother, have been rewritten a dozen times still stood on the files bearing its original date, and no other copy existed to contradict it. Books, also, were recalled and rewritten again and again, and were invariably reissued without any admission that any alteration had been made. Even the written instructions which Winston received, and which he invariably got rid of as soon as he had dealt with them, never stated or implied that an act of forgery was to be committed: always the reference was to slips, errors, misprints, or misquotations which it was necessary to put right in the interests of accuracy.


42 posted on 03/23/2021 9:51:24 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (The greatest threat to world freedom is the Chinese Communist Party and Joe Biden is their puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Sgt_Schultze

It apparently isn’t, anymore. Nor is the Wayback machine.


53 posted on 03/23/2021 10:01:23 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Sgt_Schultze

If the “archive” of the internet can be edited, how can it be relied on as accurate??
= = =

More and more information sources are coming out or being compromised as lies.

I made a smart remark some months ago, and it seems more applicable every day:

“If it is not in The Bible, they are lying to me.”


90 posted on 03/23/2021 11:00:05 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson